Construction Research Congress 2016

Perdomo-Rivera, José L.; Gonzáles-Quevedo, Antonio; Puerto, Carla López del; Maldonado-Fortunet, Francisco; Molina-Bas, Omar I.

doi:10.1061/9780784479827

Cited by 3 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…There has also been research on the methodology of comparing energy usage between certified and uncertified buildings. Choker et al [12,13] introduced an assessment methodology that compares LEED buildings to a benchmark developed from similar non-LEED building counterparts, while also accounting for variables such as the main weather, building characteristic(s), and schedule(s).…”

Section: Analysis Of the Existing Literaturementioning

confidence: 99%

“…Figure 2 shows the percentage of the total status of certification grades for buildings that obtained this certification by 2019. Among 4,406 of main certification acquired cases, Green 1-4 grades are (6,43,13, and 38)%, respectively. Green 1, the most difficult to obtain certification, was the least, while green 2 and 4 accounted for more than 80%.…”

Section: G-seedmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Comparative Analysis of Energy Consumption between Green Building Certified and Non-Certified Buildings in Korea

Won

2020

Energies

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Although interest in and the importance of green building certification have increased, it is difficult to determine how much less energy the buildings actually consume after obtaining sustainability related certification, such as LEED in the USA, and G-SEED in Korea. Focusing on building energy evaluation, we compared and analyzed the energy evaluation items of LEED and G-SEED. In addition, from the Korean public data portal site, this study investigated the annual site energy consumption (electricity and gas) per floor area of non-residential buildings that obtained G-SEED certification in Korea. The energy consumption of non-certified general buildings was compared with the energy consumption of certified buildings. As a result of examining 84 samples of this study, non-residential buildings with G-SEED certification showed energy use intensity that was at least (35.5 to 48.9)% lower than that of uncertified buildings.

show abstract

Section: Analysis Of the Existing Literaturementioning

confidence: 99%

Section: G-seedmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparative Analysis of Energy Consumption between Green Building Certified and Non-Certified Buildings in Korea

Won

2020

Energies

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Cost of Occupational Incidents for Electrical Contractors: Comparison Using Robust-Factorial Analysis of Variance

Gholizadeh

Esmaeili

2020

J. Constr. Eng. Manage.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Multi-Disciplinary Characteristics of Double-Skin Facades for Computational Modeling Perspective and Practical Design Considerations

Memari

Solnosky

2022

Buildings

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Vertical building enclosures known as Double-skin façades (DSFs) have become recognized as a promising façade type for buildings that place emphasis on sustainable, green, and energy-efficient design performance. DSFs are highly integrated across engineering and architecture; however, there remain limited centralized knowledge repositories that offer designers’ insight into these performance trends, multi-disciplinary collaboration, and tradeoff metrics, as well as how to go about modeling DSFs for performance under applicable loading systems when conducting design. As such, the main objective of this paper is to provide a better understanding of different types of DSF systems and their attributes from the perspective of multiple disciplines, as well as different modeling approaches. The methodology adopted is rooted in the principles of systematic literature review of design standards, research papers, and software manual literature, as well as a qualitative evaluation based on structural performance aspects. From the study, many different configurations of DSFs exist that impact each engineered system, where those system attributes impact multiple systems. This results in a need to parametrically iterate configurations within software to find a balance in DSF performance. Furthermore, there exists software easily capable of simulating these systems, yet the designer must carefully construct the models with different levels of sophistication towards DSFs and the software. This paper contains concise summaries of key attributes that designers need to consider when their project has a DSF system, along with different software modelers from which they can choose, correlating to the complexity of the design stage along with the appropriateness of the calculations.

show abstract

Construction Research Congress 2016

Cited by 3 publications

References 0 publications

Comparative Analysis of Energy Consumption between Green Building Certified and Non-Certified Buildings in Korea

Comparative Analysis of Energy Consumption between Green Building Certified and Non-Certified Buildings in Korea

Cost of Occupational Incidents for Electrical Contractors: Comparison Using Robust-Factorial Analysis of Variance

Multi-Disciplinary Characteristics of Double-Skin Facades for Computational Modeling Perspective and Practical Design Considerations

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About