2021
DOI: 10.1111/bjet.13084
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Constructionist co‐design: A dual approach to curriculum and professional development

Abstract: This paper reports on the first iteration of the Computational Thinking Summer Institute, a monthlong programme in which high school teachers codesigned computationally enhanced mathematics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
19
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
2
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The way teachers use curricula is naturally a process of design. Participating in the design process can help them learn new content and skills and push them to reflect upon the strengths and shortfalls of their existing teaching practice and evaluate their students' needs [54]. A design-based approach in workplace learning provides teachers the opportunity to learn how to use specific technologies in the context of their curricular needs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The way teachers use curricula is naturally a process of design. Participating in the design process can help them learn new content and skills and push them to reflect upon the strengths and shortfalls of their existing teaching practice and evaluate their students' needs [54]. A design-based approach in workplace learning provides teachers the opportunity to learn how to use specific technologies in the context of their curricular needs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, the CT-STEM taxonomy has been widely used as a design framework to support curricula created with tightly integrated CT activities (e.g., Guo et al, 2016;Thompson et al, 2020) and teacher training programs (e.g., Kelter et al, 2021;Peel et al, 2020). Recent studies show that science units designed according to the CT-STEM taxonomy can improve students' CT skills and science content learning (e.g., Guo et al, 2016;Arastoopour Irgens et al, 2020;Swanson et al, 2018).…”
Section: Computational Thinking In Science Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subsequently, Weintrop et al (2016) interviewed scientists and mathematicians who use computing in their day‐to‐day work and operationalized CT‐STEM as a taxonomy of computational practices in four categories: data analysis, computational problem‐solving, modeling and simulation, and systems thinking (Figure 1). In recent years, the CT‐STEM taxonomy has been widely used as a design framework to support curricula created with tightly integrated CT activities (e.g., Guo et al, 2016; Thompson et al, 2020) and teacher training programs (e.g., Kelter et al, 2021; Peel et al, 2020). Recent studies show that science units designed according to the CT‐STEM taxonomy can improve students' CT skills and science content learning (e.g., Guo et al, 2016; Arastoopour Irgens et al, 2020; Swanson et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To nurture children's SRL using science activities, teachers must become competent self-regulated learners who possess the necessary knowledge and positive a itudes towards science [83]. Well-designed education interventions, such as teachers' PD programs, can help teachers become self-regulated learners [68,69].…”
Section: Professional Development Programsmentioning
confidence: 99%