2019
DOI: 10.3934/amc.2019022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Constructions of optimal balanced $ (m, n, \{4, 5\}, 1) $-OOSPCs

Abstract: Kitayama proposed a novel OCDMA (called spatial CDMA) for parallel transmission of 2-D images through multicore fiber. Optical orthogonal signature pattern codes (OOSPCs) play an important role in this CDMA network. Multiple-weight (MW) optical orthogonal signature pattern code (OOSPC) was introduced by Kwong and Yang for 2-D image transmission in multicore-fiber optical code-division multiple-access (OCDMA) networks with multiple quality of services (QoS) requirements. Some results had been done on optimal ba… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this section, we will prove Theorem 1.1. Lemma 4.1 There exists an (u × v, g × h, {4, 5}, 1)-BDP for (u, v, g, h) = (2, 36, 2, 4), (2, 72, 2, 8), (2, 108, 2, 12), (4, 72, 4, 8), (6, 12, 2, 4), (6,36,2,12), (12,24,4,8), (18,4,2,4), (18,12,2,12).…”
Section: The Proof Of Theorem 11mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In this section, we will prove Theorem 1.1. Lemma 4.1 There exists an (u × v, g × h, {4, 5}, 1)-BDP for (u, v, g, h) = (2, 36, 2, 4), (2, 72, 2, 8), (2, 108, 2, 12), (4, 72, 4, 8), (6, 12, 2, 4), (6,36,2,12), (12,24,4,8), (18,4,2,4), (18,12,2,12).…”
Section: The Proof Of Theorem 11mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A (4u × 8, 4 × 8, {4, 5}, 1)-BDP exists from the above, and a (v, 5; 1)-CDM is from Lemma 3.2, the conclusion comes from Corollary 3.4 by using a (4 × 8v, 4 × 8, {4, 5}, 1)-BDP. Lemma 4.8 If u, v are positive integers such that gcd(uv, 30) = 1, then there exists a (gu × hv, g × h, {4, 5}, 1)-BDP for (g, h) = (4, 24), (4, 120), (12,8), (20,24).…”
Section: The Proof Of Theorem 11mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations