2003
DOI: 10.1163/22138617-08303004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Consular Jurisdiction in the Ottoman Legal System in the Eighteenth Century

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Both organizations also had a monopoly over their country's trade with the Levant. In contrast, the Dutch Republic followed the principle of free trade despite having a similar government body (Boogert 2003, pp. 618–19).…”
Section: Institutional Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Both organizations also had a monopoly over their country's trade with the Levant. In contrast, the Dutch Republic followed the principle of free trade despite having a similar government body (Boogert 2003, pp. 618–19).…”
Section: Institutional Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That is, beratlıs chose different jurisdictions, not for efficiency gains, but to extract rents from their partners. Boogert (2003) shows that in the Ottoman Empire, a plaintiff had to sue a defendant at the defendant's natural jurisdiction. This rule effectively allowed defendants, especially non-Muslim Ottomans, to engage in strategic court switching by placing themselves under the jurisdiction of Ottoman or European courts.…”
Section: Explanationsmentioning
confidence: 99%