1986
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-16479-0_28
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Consultation system for diagnosis of headache and facial pain: “Rhinos”

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
95
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(96 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
95
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, inclusive reasoning suspects a disease in the output of the exclusive process when a patient has symptoms specific to a disease. Based on the discussion with medical experts, these reasoning processes are modeled as two kinds of rules, negative rules (or exclusive rules) and positive rules; the former corresponds to exclusive reasoning, the latter to inclusive reasoning [4]. 1 …”
Section: Focusing Mechanismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, inclusive reasoning suspects a disease in the output of the exclusive process when a patient has symptoms specific to a disease. Based on the discussion with medical experts, these reasoning processes are modeled as two kinds of rules, negative rules (or exclusive rules) and positive rules; the former corresponds to exclusive reasoning, the latter to inclusive reasoning [4]. 1 …”
Section: Focusing Mechanismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the author was involved in developing an expert system for differential diagnosis of headache [3], he focused on the nature of description and frequency as shown in Section III. The informal history about how the author reached rough sets is shown in Appendix 2.…”
Section: B Classification Of Headachementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this system, a diagnostic model proposed by Matsumura [3] is applied to the domain, which consists of the following three kinds of reasoning processes: exclusive reasoning, inclusive reasoning, and reasoning about complications.…”
Section: Appendix 1:rhinosmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Targeting is promoted by the high mobility of the soft gel particles in the smallest capillaries. As for other nanoparticles, targeting can be effected by the EPR effect (enhanced permeability and retention) observed for tumor tissue [6] and by decoration with specific ligands, (e.g., peptides and glucosides). In contrast to solid nanoparticles, hydrophilic nanogels can be designed to respond to changes in temperature and pH by a change in the degree of swelling.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%