1994
DOI: 10.1207/s1532768xjepc0502_5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Consultee and Client Remedial and Preventive Outcomes Following Consultation: Some Mixed Empirical Results and Directions for Future Researchers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
20
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
2
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, the current sample size was small, which limits the conclusions that can be drawn. However, Bergan and Kratochwill (1990) argue that case studies have advantages over formal group or single‐case experimental designs, as they provide a richer array of information on the consultation process by facilitating the definition of the consultation processes; the collection of data about treatment integrity; and the assessment of a broader range of data (Robbins and Gutkin, 1994). Therefore small N and case study designs have been consistently recommended in the consultation literature as the most effective research designs (Gutkin, 1993).…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, the current sample size was small, which limits the conclusions that can be drawn. However, Bergan and Kratochwill (1990) argue that case studies have advantages over formal group or single‐case experimental designs, as they provide a richer array of information on the consultation process by facilitating the definition of the consultation processes; the collection of data about treatment integrity; and the assessment of a broader range of data (Robbins and Gutkin, 1994). Therefore small N and case study designs have been consistently recommended in the consultation literature as the most effective research designs (Gutkin, 1993).…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because some researchers have shown that teachers may not be reliable informants of treatment integrity (Robbins & Gutkin, 1994;Wickstrom, Jones, LaFleur, & Witt, 1998), random treatment integrity checks were also conducted by the experimenters across 43% of the observation sessions. First, the teacher was requested to complete an intervention checklist on a daily basis for each of the three intervals.…”
Section: Interobserver Reliability and Treatment Integritymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Measurement of treatment implementation has not been a consistent feature of consultation studies. The available data would indicate that when researchers ask consultees if they have implemented the specified interventions they generally report that they have (e.g., Sheridan et al, 1990), but data exist that indicate that these accounts may not match direct measures of implementation (Robbins & Gutkin, 1994;Wickstrom, 1995). Among the studies that have directly measured treatment implementation, some have found adequate levels of treatment implementation (D. Fuchs et al, 1990a(D. Fuchs et al, , 1996, whereas others have found rapidly deteriorating levels of treatment implementation (Noell et al, 1997;).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, there is frequently a lack of correspondence between what individuals say and what they do. Second, some data exist that indicate a poor agreement between observed and teacher-reported levels of treatment implementation (Robbins & Gutkin, 1994;Wickstrom, 1995). Finally, from an epistemological perspective, it is inappropriate to accept an indirect indicator for a variable of interest when that variable can be measured directly.…”
Section: Definition Of Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%