2018
DOI: 10.1017/s0031182018001488
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Consumer and host body size effects on the removal of trematode cercariae by ambient communities

Abstract: Parasite transmission can be altered via the removal of parasites by the ambient communities in which parasite–host interactions take place. However, the mechanisms driving parasite removal remain poorly understood. Using marine trematode cercariae as a model system, we investigated the effects of consumer and host body size on parasite removal rates. Laboratory experiments revealed that consumer or host body size significantly affected cercarial removal rates in crabs, oysters and cockles but not in shrimps. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
2
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hopper et al [37] indicate that not all co-occurring non-host species are of equal importance, even within representatives of one feeding functional group. This point of view supports Welsh et al [61] who suggest that parasite removal rates by predators are species specific, while Selbach et al [38] emphasize that the use of cercariae as prey is highly dependent on the interspecific interaction between their dispersion behaviour and the feeding behaviour of predators. However, other factors influencing cercarial consumption have not been taken into account, such as diluter density or initial density of cercariae [21,53].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…Hopper et al [37] indicate that not all co-occurring non-host species are of equal importance, even within representatives of one feeding functional group. This point of view supports Welsh et al [61] who suggest that parasite removal rates by predators are species specific, while Selbach et al [38] emphasize that the use of cercariae as prey is highly dependent on the interspecific interaction between their dispersion behaviour and the feeding behaviour of predators. However, other factors influencing cercarial consumption have not been taken into account, such as diluter density or initial density of cercariae [21,53].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…The greater vulnerability to predation has been attributed to the dispersion strategy and much larger body of Trichobilharzia sp. “peregra” cercariae, as also documented for other predator–prey–parasite interactions (e.g., [ 67 , 68 , 69 , 70 ]). Therefore, generating an alternative phenotype, which may benefit from owning a large body potentially facilitating transmission of cercariae, can be at the same time substantially mitigated.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…Potential consumers of cercariae encompass a variety of non‐host organisms including fish, insect larvae, rotifers, bivalves or arthropods (e.g. Kaplan et al., 2009; Orlofske et al., 2015; Welsh et al., 2014, 2019), in which consumption does not lead to successful parasite transmission (Johnson et al., 2010; Thieltges et al., 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%