2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.physa.2019.121263
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Consumer-based modeling and ranking of the consumption factors of cryptocurrencies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…EFA is a multivariate method that has two primary purposes. The first is finding the minimum number of factors with the maximum amount of information and the second purpose is to identify how indicators used empirically are configured in factors that are not directly observed, representing the facets or dimensions of the phenomenon being investigated (Sobhanifard and Sadatfarizani, 2019; Johnson and Wichern, 2007).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…EFA is a multivariate method that has two primary purposes. The first is finding the minimum number of factors with the maximum amount of information and the second purpose is to identify how indicators used empirically are configured in factors that are not directly observed, representing the facets or dimensions of the phenomenon being investigated (Sobhanifard and Sadatfarizani, 2019; Johnson and Wichern, 2007).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since this test is based on populations' average rating, it can rank related variables as populations. (Sobhanifard & Sadatfarizani, 2019). Tables 10 and 11 show Friedman's test results for the ranking of effective care training factors for patients with COVID-19 through social network messages.…”
Section: Friedman Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, ICT funds remain not fully used [15]. They can be actively used for mining, forging (minting) and ICO cryptocurrencies [16].…”
Section: Analysis Of the Potential Of Digital Youth Entrepreneurship mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Human potential. Evaluation of the RG of young people by structure (total, urban, rural) and age groups(15)(16)(17)(18)(19), 20-24, 25-29, 30-34 years) revealed the following.According to the dynamics of the total number of young people 2005-2018 (Figure 1), the group 30-34 has the highest positive median RG value (Me = 1.67%) with the smallest variance (Ϭ 2 = 0.91). Negative median RG value in two groups of 15-19 (Me = -2.84%) and 20-24 (Me = -3.05%) with dispersion (Ϭ 2 = 14.57) and (Ϭ 2 = 15.91), respectively.Source: calculated and built according to the Federal State Statistics Service of the Russian Federation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%