Consumer-Clinician Co-Taught Training About Borderline Personality Disorder

Abstract

Data confirm preliminary findings that adding a consumer-presenter to training adds considerable value.

People with a borderline personality disorder diagnosis describe discriminatory experiences

“…A lack of specialised training may be a critical issue in staff attitudes, and several studies querying what effect various educational and training programmes have on staff attitudes have been conducted (Miller & Davenport 1996;Krawitz 2004;Commons Treloar & Lewis 2008b;Krawitz & Jackson 2008;Commons Treloar 2009b). These studies tend to support conclusions that specific training about BPD does improve staff attitudes and confidence in working with this group, although these improvements are not always maintained over time.…”

A scoping review of patient‐led teaching of health professions students

“…A majority of studies directed their educational intervention to students of a singular health profession (nursing n = 1, medicine n = 15, speech pathology n = 1) 10,14–19,21–30 . Eight studies enrolled a variety of allied health into their Patients as Teachers programme 11–13,20,31–34 …”

“…10,[14][15][16][17][18][19][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30] Eight studies enrolled a variety of allied health into their Patients as Teachers programme. [11][12][13]20,[31][32][33][34] Most studies assessed the impact postintervention on a group of students (n = 18) 10,11,13,14,16,17,19,20,22,24,[26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33] and a smaller subset conducted preanalysis and postanalysis (n = 5). 14,18,19,21,34 Comparison with a control group was performed in two studies (n = 2).…”

“…Quantitative measurements through questionnaires/surveys were less common. 11,18,20,21,26,31,34 These evaluations were heavily skewed to participants' reactions to the intervention, which can be classified as level 1 of Kirkpatrick evaluation outcomes (Supplementary Figure 1). 9 Four authors utilised preintervention and postintervention measurements to demonstrate definitive changes in attitudes, knowledge and competencies.…”

“…14,18,19,21 Qualitative methods, questionnaires, essays and discussions were used for preintervention and postintervention assessment by Mckinlay, Krawitz and Donaghy. 14,19,34 Meanwhile, Coodin and Saketkoo both utilised a quantitative means (multiple-choice questionnaires) of outcome assessment, allowing for statistical comparison between control and exposed groups. 18,21 Saketkoo was also the only study to use an Objective Structured Clinical Examination to compare controls and exposed groups, uniquely assessing Kirkpatrick level 3 behavioural change.…”