Energy Transition 2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-93518-8_11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Consumer (Co-)Ownership in Renewables in Denmark

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, state ownership of electricity generation remains pervasive in the Czech Republic [22]; existing energy generators remain dominant in France, Italy, the Netherlands, the UK (at the time an EU member), and Switzerland [23][24][25][26][27]. In contrast, smaller market participants have emerged in Denmark and Germany [28,29] as more liberal policies have emerged. In Germany in particular, to accelerate the adoption of renewable energy, government-regulated feed-in prices and access have provided financial security and assisted with long-term planning of MGs, supported by a longstanding political consensus across the major parties.…”
Section: Value Streamsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, state ownership of electricity generation remains pervasive in the Czech Republic [22]; existing energy generators remain dominant in France, Italy, the Netherlands, the UK (at the time an EU member), and Switzerland [23][24][25][26][27]. In contrast, smaller market participants have emerged in Denmark and Germany [28,29] as more liberal policies have emerged. In Germany in particular, to accelerate the adoption of renewable energy, government-regulated feed-in prices and access have provided financial security and assisted with long-term planning of MGs, supported by a longstanding political consensus across the major parties.…”
Section: Value Streamsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[40] note that the existing body of literature on community MGs is concentrated on the technical and economic dimensions; academic publications on institutional design and business models are rare. In possibly the first attempt to interpret the institutions of community MGs from a social science perspective, [28] described a 'common pool resource' approach to address the institutional character of governance, social acceptance and innovation related to sustainable management of social-technical systems such as MGs. He argued that to effectively establish such systems requires institutions that unite currently separate and poorly coordinated decision making, support mutual trust, and generate suitable governance frameworks and policies to cultivate favorable conditions for new technologies.…”
Section: Community Microgridsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, only 1.1% of the heat demand in DH systems was supplied by heat pumps (HPs) in 2018 [14], which indicates a very low integration of the electricity and H&C sectors, in spite of the existing high potential for it. Denmark is also well known for its significant levels of local and inclusive ownership of the energy system [11,15]. Nevertheless, since the second half of the 1990s there has been a trend for exclusive and distant ownership of wind turbines, which is one of the reasons for the observed increase of local opposition to them [6,11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Citizen ownership in Denmark is common for onshore and open-door offshore wind farms, combined heat and power (CHP) plants, DH systems, distribution system operators (DSOs), biogas plants, household wind turbine and photovoltaic installations, etc. [105]. Large-scale citizen ownership models are also common in Denmark [105], unlike in other EU countries [104].…”
Section: The Chosen Socio-technical Contexts: Denmark and Swedenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[105]. Large-scale citizen ownership models are also common in Denmark [105], unlike in other EU countries [104]. Furthermore, there is at least one empirical example of coownership of wind turbines and DH systems [34], [103], which was implemented in response to the insufficient institutional incentives for investment in wind power and power-to-heat [35].…”
Section: The Chosen Socio-technical Contexts: Denmark and Swedenmentioning
confidence: 99%