Consumer Devices for Patient-Generated Health Data Using Blood Pressure Monitors for Managing Hypertension: Systematic Review

Abstract

Background In the era of digital health information technology, there has been a proliferation of devices that collect patient-generated health data (PGHD), including consumer blood pressure (BP) monitors. Despite their widespread use, it remains unclear whether such devices can improve health outcomes. Objective We performed a systematic review of the literature on consumer BP monitors that collect PGHD for managing hypertension to summarize their clinical impact on health and surrogate outcomes. We focused particularly on studies designed to measure the specific effect of using a BP monitor independent of cointerventions. We have also summarized the process and consumer experience outcomes. Methods An information specialist searched PubMed, MEDLINE, and Embase for controlled studies on consumer BP monitors published up to May 12, 2020. We assessed the risk of bias using an adapted 9-item appraisal tool and performed a narrative synthesis of the results. Results We identified 41 different types of BP monitors used in 49 studies included for review. Device engineers judged that 38 (92%) of those devices were similar to the currently available consumer BP monitors. The median sample size was 222 (IQR 101-416) participants, and the median length of follow-up was 6 (IQR 3-12) months. Of the included studies, 18 (36%) were designed to isolate the clinical effects of BP monitors; 6 of the 18 (33%) studies evaluated health outcomes (eg, mortality, hospitalizations, and quality of life), and data on those outcomes were unclear. The lack of clarity was due to low event rates, short follow-up duration, and risk of bias. All 18 studies that isolated the effect of BP monitors measured both systolic and diastolic BP and generally demonstrated a decrease of 2 to 4 mm Hg in systolic BP and 1 to 3 mm Hg in diastolic BP compared with non–BP monitor groups. Adherence to using consumer BP monitors ranged from 38% to 89%, and ease of use and satisfaction ratings were generally high. Adverse events were infrequent, but there were a few technical problems with devices (eg, incorrect device alerts). Conclusions Overall, BP monitors offer small benefits in terms of BP reduction; however, the health impact of these devices continues to remain unclear. Future studies are needed to examine the effectiveness of BP monitors that transmit data to health care providers. Additional data from implementation studies may help determine which components are critical for sustained BP improvement, which in turn may improve prescription decisions by clinicians and coverage decisions by policy makers.

Patient and Provider Perspectives About the Use of Patient-Generated Health Data During Pregnancy: Qualitative Exploratory Study

“…Despite interest in expanding the use of PGHD during pregnancy, little work has investigated the perspectives of stakeholders in the use of PGHD, including those of pregnant individuals providing this information and the providers receiving and using this information to improve obstetric care. While patients and providers in our study commented about the clinical benefits of using PGHD, for which there is a mixture of evidence in the literature [ 15 , 51 , 52 ], they also suggested the additional benefit of improving patients’ involvement in their care through the collection of PGHD. In nonpregnant populations, the collection of PGHD has been recognized to create an opportunity for self-reflection among patients that can encourage patient-provider communication, which, in turn, increases provider awareness of patient concerns [ 53 ].…”

Development and Application of Natural Language Processing on Unstructured Data in Hypertension: A Scoping Review

“…[1] The management and understanding of this condition have been greatly influenced by the rapid advancement of technology and the growing availability of vast amounts of health-related data. [2, 3] In particular, the advent of Natural Language Processing (NLP) has opened new avenues for researchers and healthcare practitioners to extract valuable insights from the vast sea of unstructured data in hypertension.…”

Successful Integration of EN/ISO 13606–Standardized Extracts From a Patient Mobile App Into an Electronic Health Record: Description of a Methodology

“…Traditionally, physicians were the only actor who registered patient data in health information systems (HISs). In recent years, the focus has shifted toward more active participation by patients in their own health care, particularly by means of patient-generated health data (PGHD) [ 1 ].…”