2002
DOI: 10.1006/rtph.2002.1581
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Consumer Exposure to Fragrance Ingredients: Providing Estimates for Safety Evaluation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
50
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 309 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These concentrations are multiplied by the amount of product applied, the number of applications per day for each product type, and a ''retention factor'' (ranging from 0.001 to 1.0) to account for the length of time a product may remain on the skin and/or likelihood of the fragrance ingredient being removed by washing. The resultant calculation represents the total consumer exposure (mg/kg/day) (Cadby et al, 2002;Ford et al, 2000). This is a conservative calculation of dermal systemic exposure because it makes the unlikely assumption that a consumer will use these 10 products which are all perfumed with the upper 97.5th percentile level of the fragrance ingredient from a fine fragrance type of the product (Cadby et al, 2002;Ford et al, 2000).…”
Section: Exposure Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These concentrations are multiplied by the amount of product applied, the number of applications per day for each product type, and a ''retention factor'' (ranging from 0.001 to 1.0) to account for the length of time a product may remain on the skin and/or likelihood of the fragrance ingredient being removed by washing. The resultant calculation represents the total consumer exposure (mg/kg/day) (Cadby et al, 2002;Ford et al, 2000). This is a conservative calculation of dermal systemic exposure because it makes the unlikely assumption that a consumer will use these 10 products which are all perfumed with the upper 97.5th percentile level of the fragrance ingredient from a fine fragrance type of the product (Cadby et al, 2002;Ford et al, 2000).…”
Section: Exposure Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These concentrations are multiplied by the amount of product applied, the number of applications per day for each product type, and a ''retention factor'' (ranging from 0.001 to 1.0) to account for the length of time a product may remain on the skin and/or likelihood of the fragrance ingredient being removed by washing. The resultant calculation represents the total consumer exposure (mg/ kg/day) (Cadby et al, 2002;Ford et al, 2000). This is a conservative calculation of dermal systemic exposure because it makes the unlikely assumption that a consumer will use these 10 products which are all perfumed with the upper 97.5 percentile level of the fragrance ingredient from a fine fragrance type of the product (Cadby et al, 2002;Ford et al, 2000).…”
Section: Exposure Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The resultant calculation represents the total consumer exposure (mg/ kg/day) (Cadby et al, 2002;Ford et al, 2000). This is a conservative calculation of dermal systemic exposure because it makes the unlikely assumption that a consumer will use these 10 products which are all perfumed with the upper 97.5 percentile level of the fragrance ingredient from a fine fragrance type of the product (Cadby et al, 2002;Ford et al, 2000). The 97.5 percentile use level in formulae for use in cosmetics in general has been reported to be 7.5% (IFRA, 2004), which would result in a maximum daily exposure on the skin of 0.1911 mg/kg for high end users (see Table 1).…”
Section: Exposure Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…perfumes, deodorants, washing and cleaning agents, cosmetics). Typical concentrations of fragrances range from 0.3% in face creams to as much as 20% in perfume extracts (Cadby et al, 2002). Most of the fragrances used nowadays are synthesized by industry, and nitro musks and polycyclic musks are the two main categories.…”
Section: Pharmaceuticals and Personal Care Productsmentioning
confidence: 99%