2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jretconser.2018.12.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Consumer preferences for beer attributes in Germany: A conjoint and latent class approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
28
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One way to measure preferences among customers is the utilization of conjoint analysis [16][17][18][19]. This tool is widely used in marketing and consumer research [20][21][22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One way to measure preferences among customers is the utilization of conjoint analysis [16][17][18][19]. This tool is widely used in marketing and consumer research [20][21][22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Koch and Sauerbronn [17] analysed the craft beer consumption in Brazil and realised that "Drink less, drink better" is the main motto of the Brazilian craft beer consumers, who show commitment to enjoyment and responsibility while rejecting mass-produced beer and antisocial behaviours. Meyerding et al [18] focused on consumer preferences for beer attributes in the German market. The attributes "type," "price," and "origin" had the highest importance for the majority of consumers.…”
Section: Introduction 1introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Louviere and Woodworth (1983) proposed a design approach for multiple-choice alternatives. Conjoint analysis methods and DCEs have been applied in a broad array of disciplines like healthcare (Strauss et al , 2018), food industry (Meyerding et al , 2019; Chamhuri and Batt, 2013) and tourism industry (Kim et al , 2018b). Examples of utilization of conjoint analysis can also be found in the telecommunication industry extensively (Confraria et al , 2017; Kim et al , 2018a; Sobolewski and Kopczewski, 2017; Srinuan et al , 2012; Dagli and Jenkins, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%