“…Table 2, based on a review of research measuring aesthetics of marketing stimuli, is an attempt to categorise all studies in a two dimensional grid. The robustness of this visualisation is enhanced due to a broad consensus that exists among researchers about aesthetic response variables (e.g., Bellizzi & Hite, 1992; Bangle, 2001;Bloch, 1995;2011;Bloch & Richins, 1992;Brunel & Swain, 2008;Deng et al, 2010;Eckman & Wagner, 1994;Hagtvedt & Patrick, 2008;Hsiao et al, 2011;Patrick & Hagtvedt, 2011;Raghubir & Greenleaf, 2006;Townsend & Shu, 2010;Townsend & Sood, 2012;Veryzer, 1993;Yoshimura & Vanagi, 2001Blijlevens et al, 2009Cox & Cox, 2002;Dahl et al, 1999;Desmet & Hekkert, 2007;Eckman & Wagner, 1995;Garber, 1995;Kumar & Garg, 2010;Veryzer, 1995 Bloch, 1995;Donovan & Rossiter,1982;Turley & Milliman, 2000;Veryzer, 1993). Further, it helps in identifying an important knowledge gap in this domain.…”