2008
DOI: 10.1509/jimk.16.1.72
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Consumer Responses to Service Failures: A Resource Preference Model of Cultural Influences

Abstract: This article highlights consumers’ preference for economic (versus social) resources in individualist (versus collectivist) cultures and demonstrates the multifaceted effects of culture on consumer responses to service failures. A cross-cultural study involving American and Chinese participants in the setting of a computer repair service confirms seven of eight hypotheses derived from the resource preference model. The results indicate that Americans (versus Chinese) are more dissatisfied with an outcome failu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
104
1
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 133 publications
(108 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
2
104
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…6. Negative WOM scale (Chan and Wan ,2008), 7. Customer purchase intention scale (Dodds et al, 1991;Steenkamp et al, 2003).…”
Section: Measurement Scalesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6. Negative WOM scale (Chan and Wan ,2008), 7. Customer purchase intention scale (Dodds et al, 1991;Steenkamp et al, 2003).…”
Section: Measurement Scalesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only some minor changes were conducted to the scales to better suit the research topic and respondents of this study. The scales adopted in the thesis include: brand familiarity scale (Steenkamp et al 2003) (scale items were deducted to 2 from 4), brand attitude scale (Keller and Aaker 1992), brand quality perception scale (Steenkamp et al 2003), perceived brand globalness scale (Batra et al 2000;Steenkamp et al 2003), customer dissatisfaction scale Roem and Brady 2007), negative WOM scale (Chan and Wan 2008), purchase intention scale (Dodds et al 1991;Steenkamp et al 2003), and CETSCALE (Shimp and Sharma 1987;Steenkamp et al 2003). Minor justifications were conducted to some wordings of the scales to make the questions more suitable to the experiment.…”
Section: Measurement Scalesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fictitious brand of the restaurant was positioned either as a global or local brand. Many studies about service failure designed the failure as time delay such as, the late of the flight, or the late of the food serving (Brady, 2007, Chan andWan, 2008). I borrowed that design to the study and described the failure of the restaurant as "The restaurant promised to serve the food within 15 minutes but kept you waiting for 30 minutes.…”
Section: Samples and Stimulusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Discount and apology are considered as the most two important strategies in the service recovery literature (Chan & Wan, 2008;Maxham, 2001;Smith & Bolton, 1998;Smith et al, 1999). Discount is regarded as the "most important recovery dimension" for service failure recovery , whereas the apology was considered as a valuable reward that compensates self-esteem (Walster, Berscheid, & Walster, 1973).…”
Section: Chapter 3 Research Framework and Hypotheses Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other words, satisfaction is greater when resources from the same/similar categories are exchanged than when resources from different categories are exchanged (Brinberg & Wood, 1983;Foa et al, 1992;Smith et al, 1999). Under the framework of resource exchange theory, the relative attractiveness of different resources were examined across several factors such as the culture (Chan & Wan, 2008), gender, and life stage (Foa et al, 1992). In the same vein, service failure and recovery strategies can be treated as a kind of resource exchange.…”
Section: The Mediation Role Of Expectation Discrepancymentioning
confidence: 99%