2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2008.08.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Consumer revenge behavior: A cross-cultural perspective

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
179
0
28

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 181 publications
(215 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
8
179
0
28
Order By: Relevance
“…Revenge, according to Zourrig et al (2009), is a problem-focussed strategy, in which consumers find their solutions through revenge, which in turn releases the anger caused by the injustice. TheInternet enables consumers to publicly complain with the intention to harm a company..Research has increasingly discussed the perspectives of consumers who take revenge through the Internet (La Nagard and de Campos Ribeiro, 2011;Zourrig et al, 2009; Gregorie et al, 2010). Indirect revenge, such as public complaining online, was found not to be dependent on consumer perceived power vis-à-vis the firm unlike direct forms of revenge (e.g.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Revenge, according to Zourrig et al (2009), is a problem-focussed strategy, in which consumers find their solutions through revenge, which in turn releases the anger caused by the injustice. TheInternet enables consumers to publicly complain with the intention to harm a company..Research has increasingly discussed the perspectives of consumers who take revenge through the Internet (La Nagard and de Campos Ribeiro, 2011;Zourrig et al, 2009; Gregorie et al, 2010). Indirect revenge, such as public complaining online, was found not to be dependent on consumer perceived power vis-à-vis the firm unlike direct forms of revenge (e.g.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the fact that most of the literature examines forgiveness following a specific offense, the concept has also a dispositional character, which very few studies addressed (e.g., Berry, Worthington, Parrott, O'Connor, & Wade, 2001). 1) nikoletta.siamagka@kcl.ac.uk Forgiveness in the marketing domain has mostly been investigated in the context of services failures (e.g., Tsarenko & Tojib, 2011;Zourrig et al, 2009). Most of the research in this area relates to the concept of consumer forgiveness, which is defined as 'consumers' willingness to give up retaliation, alienation, and other destructive behaviours, and to respond in constructive ways after an organisational violation of trust and the related recovery efforts' (Xie & Peng, 2009, p. 578).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the desire for revenge is a need, it can either be repressed or acted upon (Gregoire et al, 2010;Gregoire and Fisher, 2006;Zourigg et al, 2009). These revenge behaviours are defined as a categorisation of actions performed by consumers in order to warn other consumers against the firm responsible, to cause harm to the firm or to gain closure surrounding the incident (Bougie et al, 2003;Cheng et al, 2006;Gregoire et al, 2010;Gregoire and Fisher, 2006).…”
Section: From Service Failure To Revengementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Revenge behaviours are the actions that a consumer takes against a firm after service failure, with the intention to cause harm or get even with the firm (Cheng et al, 2006;Gregoire et al, 2010;Hibbard et al, 2001;Ward and Ostrom, 2006;Zourigg et al, 2009). Revenge behaviours are classified as either direct or indirect.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%