2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jretconser.2021.102779
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Consumer rights or unethical behaviors: Exploring the impacts of retailer return policies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is often used to quell consumer concerns and to endorse the quality of the goods on sale (Oghazi et al ., 2018). The return policy of CBEC can effectively enhance consumer perception on product quality, avoid commercial fraud and personal loss, and gain customer trust and loyalty (Six et al ., 2010; Chang and Yang, 2022; Mou et al ., 2017; Yang et al ., 2020). In CBEC, customer satisfaction is highly influenced by the perceived leniency of the return policy (Jeng, 2017), which is determined by the restrictions, deadlines, the convenience of the process, and the return costs (Shao et al ., 2021).…”
Section: Theoretical Background and Hypothesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is often used to quell consumer concerns and to endorse the quality of the goods on sale (Oghazi et al ., 2018). The return policy of CBEC can effectively enhance consumer perception on product quality, avoid commercial fraud and personal loss, and gain customer trust and loyalty (Six et al ., 2010; Chang and Yang, 2022; Mou et al ., 2017; Yang et al ., 2020). In CBEC, customer satisfaction is highly influenced by the perceived leniency of the return policy (Jeng, 2017), which is determined by the restrictions, deadlines, the convenience of the process, and the return costs (Shao et al ., 2021).…”
Section: Theoretical Background and Hypothesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Academics have paid attention to the impacts of return policies and services on several consumer responses, such as purchase intention and decision (e.g., Rokonuzzaman et al, 2020;Shao et al, 2021;Abdulla et al, 2022), return or keep intention and behavior (e.g., Wood, 2001;Janakiraman and Ordóñez, 2012;Chang and Yang, 2022), buyer-seller relationships (e.g., Mollenkopf et al, 2007;Pham and Ahammad, 2017;Rintamäki et al, 2021), and post-return buying behavior (e.g., Griffis et al, 2012;Wang et al, 2020;Tandon et al, 2020). Janakiraman et al (2016) conducted a meta-analysis focusing on the effects of return policy leniency on consumer purchase and return decisions and found that leniency increases purchase more than returns.…”
Section: Background: a Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consumer effort leniency was also shown to be a key dimension of return policy leniency (Abdulla et al, 2019;Gäthke et al, 2021;Abdulla et al, 2022). Online sellers are able to manipulate their effort leniency to differentiate their return policies from those of other sellers (Chang and Yang, 2022). Return policies that are designed to require less effort on the side of the consumer are considered more lenient (Janakiraman et al, 2016).…”
Section: Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With electronic marketplaces such as Amazon, Alibaba, and eBay gaining popularity, fraudulent customer behaviour increasingly affects sellers on such platforms. Fraudulent customer behaviour online can involve manipulating and concealing information, misrepresentation, indefinite descriptions, non‐payments (Seger‐Guttmann et al., 2018), and the fabrication of pertinent details in online transactions (Chang & Yang, 2022; Garnefeld et al., 2019; Seger‐Guttmann et al., 2018). Some forms of fraudulent customer behaviour involve feedback extortion, unwarranted chargebacks, broken replica scam, buyer claiming the item was not received, empty box claim, changed address, and overpayment offers among others.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%