2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2016.03.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Consumer willingness to pay for traditional food products

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

12
140
3
20

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 200 publications
(175 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
12
140
3
20
Order By: Relevance
“…According to random utility theory, the assumption is made that a given alternative is selected if the perceived utility provided by such alternative is the highest among the different choices [29]. Conjoint choice-based methods have been widely used to simulate the purchasing process [30][31][32]. Choice-based conjoint has an advantage over rating-based conjoint due to its greater similarity to market behaviour [33]-namely to what a consumer really does when buying food since consumers must choose one alternative within each choice set by simultaneously evaluating the presented product attributes and, as a result, they are less inclined to overestimate some attributes over others.…”
Section: Design Of the Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to random utility theory, the assumption is made that a given alternative is selected if the perceived utility provided by such alternative is the highest among the different choices [29]. Conjoint choice-based methods have been widely used to simulate the purchasing process [30][31][32]. Choice-based conjoint has an advantage over rating-based conjoint due to its greater similarity to market behaviour [33]-namely to what a consumer really does when buying food since consumers must choose one alternative within each choice set by simultaneously evaluating the presented product attributes and, as a result, they are less inclined to overestimate some attributes over others.…”
Section: Design Of the Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Contrary to standard long food supply chains, where only a small proportion of total added value is captured by primary producers, FMs have the capacity to increase farmer income [42,43] if the farmer identifies and serves market niches offering price premiums over the mass markets [44]. Thus, improving farmer remuneration depends on consumers' willingness to pay a premium for products purchased and sold in short chains [45]. Consumers have been found to recognize the added value of these niche products that have the capacity to convey multiple attributes and appealing symbols (e.g., origin, quality, tradition, history) related to the territory [46].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The goodness-of-fit of the estimated models was measured using the McFadden pseudo-R 2 , which was 0.36 for Model 1 and 0.37 for Model 2. According to Hensher et al (2005: 338), a pseudo-R 2 of at least 0.3 indicates that the model fit is Balogh et al (2016) and Train and Weeks (2005) suggested that the price coefficient (in our case the coefficient for the price advantage) has to be normalized to one (for further discussion on this topic, see e.g. Scarpa et al, 2008;Scarpa and Willis, 2010 …”
Section: Estimation Of Wtamentioning
confidence: 98%