Consumers’ intention to use health recommendation systems to receive personalized nutrition advice

Abstract

BackgroundSophisticated recommendation systems are used more and more in the health sector to assist consumers in healthy decision making. In this study we investigate consumers' evaluation of hypothetical health recommendation systems that provide personalized nutrition advice. We examine consumers' intention to use such a health recommendation system as a function of options related to the underlying system (e.g. the type of company that generates the advice) as well as intermediaries (e.g. general practitioner) that might assist in using the system. We further explore if the effect of both the system and intermediaries on intention to use a health recommendation system are mediated by consumers' perceived effort, privacy risk, usefulness and enjoyment.Methods204 respondents from a consumer panel in the Netherlands participated. The data were collected by means of a questionnaire. Each respondent evaluated three hypothetical health recommendation systems on validated multi-scale measures of effort, privacy risk, usefulness, enjoyment and intention to use the system. To test the hypothesized relationships we used regression analyses.ResultsWe find evidence that the options related to the underlying system as well as the intermediaries involved influence consumers' intention to use such a health recommendation system and that these effects are mediated by perceptions of effort, privacy risk, usefulness and enjoyment. Also, we find that consumers value usefulness of a system more and enjoyment less when a general practitioner advices them to use a health recommendation system than if they use it out of their own curiosity.ConclusionsWe developed and tested a model of consumers' intention to use a health recommendation system. We found that intermediaries play an important role in how consumers evaluate such a system over and above options of the underlying system that is used to generate the recommendation. Also, health-related information services seem to rely on endorsement by the medical sector. This has considerable implications for the distribution as well as the communication channels of health recommendation systems which may be quite difficult to put into practice outside traditional health service channels.

Making personalised nutrition the easy choice: Creating policies to break down the barriers and reap the benefits

“…Some preferred personalised nutrition to be delivered as part of existing health services, while others favoured the anonymity and convenience afforded by commercial offerings (Berezowska et al, 2014;Fallaize et al, 2015;Stewart-Knox et al, 2014;. This finding was novel given that previous studies have unanimously implied that the public would prefer services to be delivered through existing health provision (Pavlidis et al, 2012;Su and Lu, 2012;Wendel et al, 2013). The Food4me survey confirmed that a large proportion of Europeans preferred health service provision, but also identified a second potential market comprised of those who preferred the anonymity and degree of control that D-T-C personalised nutrition would afford (Food4me White Paper, 2015).…”

Understanding Consumer Evaluations of Personalised Nutrition Services in Terms of the Privacy Calculus: A Qualitative Study

“…Nevertheless, it has not yet been widely used in relation to health. Limited evidence, however, shows that the privacy calculus can be relevant to the health domain [28,29,30] (fig. 1).…”

A Survey of Context-Aware Healthcare Recommender Systems

“…Other studies include predicting mental health from web usage behavior [22], collaborative filtering-based Computer Tailored Health Communication(CTHC) to provide messages tailored to individual patients [23], Health recommendation system to provide personalized nutrition advice [24]. Patient Experience Recommender System for Persuasive Communication Tailoring (PERSPeCT) was proposed, a system developed for use in a clinical trial of CTHC-based smoking cessation support interventions was proposed by [25].…”