2021
DOI: 10.1002/cb.1927
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Consumers' self‐construal: Measurement and relevance for social media communication success

Abstract: To determine the relevance of consumers' self-construal in social media contexts, this study investigates its effects on social media success metrics, such as sharing behaviour, as well as its influence on the relationship between social media success and other drivers, such as endorsers' emotion displays or the communication source (user vs. company). Along with an in-depth review of consumers' self-construal, this article reports on two quantitative panel studies, which reveal that eight items are best suite… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 89 publications
(210 reference statements)
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our study further contributes to the controversies in the current literature about how selfconstrual is measured and structured (see Hofmann et al, 2021 for a review) by using four independence and interdependence scales developed by Hashimoto and Yamagishi (2016) to comprehend the duality of self-construal. Furthermore, the discussion of the problems of discriminant and convergent validity (Levine et al, 2003), as well as the content validity of self-construal measurement scale fosters us to devote effort to specify the most appropriate measurement model among competing models (two-factor; three-factor, four-factor, two-factor second-order constructs; Adams, 2005;Cross et al, 2011;Hashimoto & Yamagishi, 2013;Hashimoto & Yamagishi, 2016;Levine et al, 2003;Wu et al, 2019) for testing the relationships.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Our study further contributes to the controversies in the current literature about how selfconstrual is measured and structured (see Hofmann et al, 2021 for a review) by using four independence and interdependence scales developed by Hashimoto and Yamagishi (2016) to comprehend the duality of self-construal. Furthermore, the discussion of the problems of discriminant and convergent validity (Levine et al, 2003), as well as the content validity of self-construal measurement scale fosters us to devote effort to specify the most appropriate measurement model among competing models (two-factor; three-factor, four-factor, two-factor second-order constructs; Adams, 2005;Cross et al, 2011;Hashimoto & Yamagishi, 2013;Hashimoto & Yamagishi, 2016;Levine et al, 2003;Wu et al, 2019) for testing the relationships.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Selfconstrual theory states that people with high interdependent self-construal are relationshiporiented and value social obligations (Singelis, 1994). Indeed, people with high interdependent self-construal are more likely to be concerned with prosocial behavior than those with high independent self-construal (Cross et al, 2011;Hofmann et al, 2021). Moreover, they are more likely to empathize with the emotions of NWOM sharers (Kwon and Sung, 2012) and, thus, are more inclined to attribute the motives of sharers to altruism.…”
Section: Negative Wordof-mouthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, previous research has empathized that consumers' self-construal, a personality trait, plays an important role in consumer behaviors such as information adoption and purchase decision (Hofmann et al. , 2021; Kwon and Sung, 2012; Wong et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Items for social commerce intention were modified from Horng and Wu ( 2020 ). Lastly, self-construal items were adopted from Hofmann et al ( 2021 ) and Singelis ( 1994 ). All the items were measured on a seven-point Likert Scale, ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 7 (strongly agree).…”
Section: Theory and Hypotheses Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%