“…Yet, it seems that in this era of rediscovering and reinventing death within the tourism spectrum, the role of the witness appears rather limiting especially if the offered product is staged or touristified (Cohen, 2011). Most literature on dark tourism has exhaustively focused on either a) what tourists witness in terms of typology of sites like prisons (Strange and Kempa, 2003), battlefields (Miles, 2014), or entire countries as North Korea (Buda and Shim, 2015), or b) why they choose to, passing from the pro-visit motivational spectrum (Biran et al, 2011;Gillen 2018) to a more general basis (Stone, 2006;Light, 2017), or c) to a lesser degree, the affective result of the experience to the Self during and postvisit (Martini and Buda, 2018;Farkic, 2020). These typologies of sites and motivations have been structured through a 'continuum of intensity' (Seaton, 1996:240;Stone, 2006) from light to darker, based on temporal dimension or what Lennon and Foley (2000) mentioned as chronological distance from death, and site association with death (Miles, 2002).…”