“…In support of the economic significance of consumption commitment, the existing literature also show that models with consumption commitment can outperform many alternative models. For example, they fit consumption data better than neoclassical models (e.g., Flavin and Nakagawa (2008)), can help explain the low stock ownership puzzle (e.g., Fratantoni), can explain why consumers insure risks and bunch uninsured risks together (e.g., Postlewaite, Silverman, and Samuelson (2008)), can help explain the discrepancy between moderate-stake and large-stake risk aversion and lottery playing by insurance buyers (e.g., Chetty and Szeidl (2007)), and can endogenize widely used reference-dependent preferences (e.g., Chetty and Szeidl (2010)). …”