2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmacro.2009.08.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Consumption home bias and exchange rate behavior

Abstract: This paper studies the response of the nominal exchange rate to monetary shocks in an economy with consumption home bias (CHB) and sticky wages. The importance of accounting for the exchange rate with CHB are twofold. CHB is a consequence of the small open economy assumption when outputs are specialized and fluctuations in the relative price of traded goods generate deviations from purchasing power parity without violating the law of one price. The CHB mechanism allows monetary shocks to generate exchange rate… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the studies made on the topic of consumption home bias, they mostly focused on the early exploration of the causes of consumption home bias, such as trade costs (Obstfeld & Rogoff, 2000;Ried, 2009), country size and openness (Sutherland, 2005;De Paoli, 2009), non-traded goods (Stockman & Dellas, 1989;Pesenti & Van Wincoop, 2002) as well as trade in intermediate input factors (Hillberry & Hummels, 2002), all are main causes that scholars believe to constitute consumption home bias. More recent studies have focused on discussion on the effect of consumption home bias, such as Pierdzioch (2004) analyzed the effect of monetary shock on different home bias and the extent of capital mobility, Hau (2002), Pitterle and Steffen (2004a;2004b), Kollmann (2004), Sutherland (2005), Leith and Lewis (2006) and Cooke (2010) discussed the effect of home bias on exchange rate fluctuations, De Paoli (2009) discussed the welfare effects of home bias and monetary policy. In addition, it worth mentioning that the effect of home bias on the optimal monetary policy is quite a hot topic recently, which including research made by Faia and Monacelli (2006), Jondeau and Sahuc (2008), Galí and Monacelli (2008) and Wang (2010); obviously, the studies made in respect of consumption home bias were quite enthusiastic, but none of literature up to now can clearly explain the role of home bias on the effects of government expenditure shock.…”
Section: The Initial Development Of Open Economy Analysis Ismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the studies made on the topic of consumption home bias, they mostly focused on the early exploration of the causes of consumption home bias, such as trade costs (Obstfeld & Rogoff, 2000;Ried, 2009), country size and openness (Sutherland, 2005;De Paoli, 2009), non-traded goods (Stockman & Dellas, 1989;Pesenti & Van Wincoop, 2002) as well as trade in intermediate input factors (Hillberry & Hummels, 2002), all are main causes that scholars believe to constitute consumption home bias. More recent studies have focused on discussion on the effect of consumption home bias, such as Pierdzioch (2004) analyzed the effect of monetary shock on different home bias and the extent of capital mobility, Hau (2002), Pitterle and Steffen (2004a;2004b), Kollmann (2004), Sutherland (2005), Leith and Lewis (2006) and Cooke (2010) discussed the effect of home bias on exchange rate fluctuations, De Paoli (2009) discussed the welfare effects of home bias and monetary policy. In addition, it worth mentioning that the effect of home bias on the optimal monetary policy is quite a hot topic recently, which including research made by Faia and Monacelli (2006), Jondeau and Sahuc (2008), Galí and Monacelli (2008) and Wang (2010); obviously, the studies made in respect of consumption home bias were quite enthusiastic, but none of literature up to now can clearly explain the role of home bias on the effects of government expenditure shock.…”
Section: The Initial Development Of Open Economy Analysis Ismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study with topic in respect of consumption home bias has mostly focused on discussion of the causes, such as trade costs (Obstfeld and Rogoff, 2000;Ried, 2009), country size and the extent of openness (Sutherland, 2005;De Paoli, 2009), non-traded goods (Stockman and Dellas, 1989;Pesenti and Wincoop, 2002) and trade in intermediate input factor (Hillberry and Hummels, 2002), which are all main causes that scholars believed for consumption home bias. More recent studies have focused on discussion of the effect of home bias, such as Pierdzioch (2004) analyzed the effects of monetary policy on different extent of home bias and the capital mobility, Hau (2002), Pitterle and Steffen (2004), Kollmann (2004), Sutherland (2005), Leith and Lewis (2006) and Cooke (2010) discussed the effect of home bias on the exchange rate fluctuation, while De Paoli (2009) discussed the welfare effects of home bias and monetary policy. In addition, it is worthy to mention that the effect of home bias on the optimal monetary policy is also a quite hot topic, where it includes works by Faia and Monacelli (2006), Jondeau and Sahuc (2008), Galí and Monacelli (2008) and Wang (2010).…”
Section: The Initial Development Of Open Economy Analysis Featured Thementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Pierdzioch (2004) studied the effects of monetary shock under consumption. Hau (2002); Kollmann (2004); Sutherland (2005); Leith and Lewis (2006) and Cooke (2010) explored home bias on the effect of exchange rate, Paoli (2009) discussed the welfare effect of monetary policy with consumption home bias. Another issue needs to mention about is home bias on the effect of formulation of the optimal monetary policy, related research including Faia and Monacelli (2006); Jondeau and Sahuc (2008); Gali and Monacelli (2008) and Wang (2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%