Consumption Inequality and Intra-household Allocations

Abstract

The consumption literature uses adult equivalence scales to measure individual level inequality. This practice imposes the assumption that there is no within household inequality. In this paper, we show that ignoring consumption inequality within households produces misleading estimates of inequality along two dimensions. First, the use of adult equivalence scales underestimates the level of cross sectional consumption inequality by 30%. This result is driven by the fact that large differences in the earnings of husbands and wives translate into large differences in consumption allocations within households. Second, the rise in inequality since the 1970s is overstated by two-thirds: within household inequality declined over time as the share of income provided by wives increased. Our findings also indicate that increases in marital sorting on wages and hours worked can simultaneously explain virtually all of the decline in within household inequality and a substantial fraction of the rise in between household inequality for one and two adult households in the UK since the 1970s.JEL Classification: D12, D13, D63, J12, J22

The food insecurity―obesity paradox as a vicious cycle for women: inequalities and health

“…In the US, Europe, and Australia, studies have consistently shown that for women the risk of obesity is 20 per cent to 40 per cent higher among individuals who are food insecure (Burns 2004, 15). An intra-household inequalities lens provides strong challenges to a household unity that models a behaviour of equal consumption (Lise and Seitz 2011) and equitable sharing of resources between two adults. For our research, intrahousehold inequalities were visible.…”

Allocation of Expenditures in Elderly Households and the Cost of Widowhood

“…These numbers indicate that 11.5 % of total inequality among women and men living in couple households arises from within household inequality. Other authors report even higher proportions, e.g., Bii'TIKOFER andGERFIN (2017) find 16% andLISE and estimate that 25% is due to within household inequality.…”

“…& shown by LISE and SEITZ (2011), inequality is likely to be underestimated when ignoring within-household inequality. In this section, inequality measures are computed for couple households, widows and widowers.…”

EquivalenceversusIndifference Scales

“…The resulting picture may be quite different from reality. Recently, Lise and Seitz (), using British data, have provided estimates of intra‐household inequality and its evolution over several decades. Their conclusion is twofold.…”