2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinre.2014.08.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Consumption of vegetables may reduce the risk of liver cancer: Results from a meta-analysis of case-control and cohort studies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Tea is exceptionally rich in Mn, one cup of tea contributing as much as 1.3 mg of Mn 35 . Our findings are concordant with previous meta-analyses of vegetables, tea drinking in relation to liver cancer risk 12, 39, 40 . Gender may impact on Mn retention in body and time of the male retention was longer than female 41 , which may be the reason that stronger inverse association was observed between dietary Mn and liver cancer risk in men than women in our study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Tea is exceptionally rich in Mn, one cup of tea contributing as much as 1.3 mg of Mn 35 . Our findings are concordant with previous meta-analyses of vegetables, tea drinking in relation to liver cancer risk 12, 39, 40 . Gender may impact on Mn retention in body and time of the male retention was longer than female 41 , which may be the reason that stronger inverse association was observed between dietary Mn and liver cancer risk in men than women in our study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…35 Our findings are concordant with previous metaanalyses of vegetables, tea drinking in relation to liver cancer risk. 12,39,40 Gender may impact on Mn retention in body and time of the male retention was longer than female, 41 which may be the reason that stronger inverse association was observed between dietary Mn and liver cancer risk in men than women in our study. The DRI of Fe is 8 mg for adult men and postmenopausal women (>50 years) and 16 mg for premenopausal women.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…[17] Publication bias was evaluated by Egger test and the threshold was set as P  < 0.05. [18] Moreover, the sensitivity analysis was evaluated by “leave one out” method with I 2  > 50% as the criterion. [18] …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[18] Moreover, the sensitivity analysis was evaluated by “leave one out” method with I 2  > 50% as the criterion. [18] …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Publication bias was assessed by Egger's test. [14] A trim and fill method was used for correction if there were significantly publication bias. [15] Finally, sensitivity analysis was conducted by omitting each study at a time to estimate the effect of each study on the overall ES.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%