2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.nut.2022.111904
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Consumption patterns of energy drinks in university students: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
9
1
2

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 100 publications
1
9
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…aged less than 18 years) in our study (12–19%) was within the same range as in a prior meta‐analysis (3–32%) [36]. It is worth noting that it is difficult to compare pooled prevalence in this study with prevalence finding in other meta‐analyses, given that there are studies providing only a range of prevalence [36], merging past‐year and past‐week prevalence [37], or the age group is not exactly the same as ours [35]. Despite this, these outcomes highlight the need to periodically monitor the consumption of ED through large‐scale national studies, as well as provide ED prevalence at several time‐periods.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 59%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…aged less than 18 years) in our study (12–19%) was within the same range as in a prior meta‐analysis (3–32%) [36]. It is worth noting that it is difficult to compare pooled prevalence in this study with prevalence finding in other meta‐analyses, given that there are studies providing only a range of prevalence [36], merging past‐year and past‐week prevalence [37], or the age group is not exactly the same as ours [35]. Despite this, these outcomes highlight the need to periodically monitor the consumption of ED through large‐scale national studies, as well as provide ED prevalence at several time‐periods.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…In comparison to the study by Zucconi et al [35], which focused upon European countries exclusively, our study found a lower pooled past 12-month prevalence in adolescents (44.5 study (12-19%) was within the same range as in a prior meta-analysis (3-32%) [36]. It is worth noting that it is difficult to compare pooled prevalence in this study with prevalence finding in other meta-analyses, given that there are studies providing only a range of prevalence [36], merging past-year and past-week prevalence [37],…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 38%
See 3 more Smart Citations