2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2008.01.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contact angle and sessile drop diameter hysteresis on metal surfaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
19
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…All authors observe contact angle behaviour depending on the thermal properties and surface roughness of the substrate. Gajewski (2008) evidence the hysteresis effect on the sessile drops contact angles with increasing drop diameters and decreasing diameters even on metallic surfaces. They evidence that aluminum and stainless steel loose their hydrophobic properties during the drop diameter increase or decrease procedure while they do not observe this behaviour with copper and brass.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…All authors observe contact angle behaviour depending on the thermal properties and surface roughness of the substrate. Gajewski (2008) evidence the hysteresis effect on the sessile drops contact angles with increasing drop diameters and decreasing diameters even on metallic surfaces. They evidence that aluminum and stainless steel loose their hydrophobic properties during the drop diameter increase or decrease procedure while they do not observe this behaviour with copper and brass.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…The Moistsense measurements had a linear correlation to the corneometer readings. Such that a dry skin corneometer measurement (20) correlated to a moistsense reading of 19; a normal skin corneometer reading (55) correlated to a moistsense reading of 49 and a moist skin corneometer reading (85) correlated to a moistsense reading of 70.…”
Section: Moisture Surveysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Work by [20] examining water contact angles across a range of materials has shown that Brass is more wettable (hydrophilic) than Steel. Both are more hydrophilic than Polypropelene and this may explain why Steel has the lowest friction coefficient in this study, following the argument of Adams et al [14].…”
Section: Materials Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The origin of the self-cleaning property of lotus leaves has been revealed to be a cooperative effect of micro-and nano-scale structures on their surfaces [5]. Cheng and his colleagues [6] emphasized the importance of the lotus leaf's nanoscale hair-like structure on its self-cleaning ability. Barthlott et al assumed that 'Lotus effect' can be transferred to artifi cial surfaces (e.g.…”
Section: Hydrophobic Surfacesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The prospect of producing surfaces that repel water suggests huge opportunities in the area of corrosion inhibition for metal components, chemical and biological agent protection for clothing, antifouling for marine vehicles, among many other applications [6]. Generally, metals are hydrophilic or wettable.…”
Section: Hydrophobicity Of Metalsmentioning
confidence: 99%