Membrane Characterization 2017
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-444-63776-5.00012-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contact Angle Measurements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
105
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 139 publications
(107 citation statements)
references
References 108 publications
2
105
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A hydrophobic surface enables a reagent to combine with a bioparticle or sample to form a droplet; the reagent can then be heated, cooled, and mixed by exerting a voltage on the droplet. The CA, which generally represents the wettability of a solid surface by a liquid, is defined by the angle between the liquid–vapor interface and solid–liquid interfaces [ 27 , 28 ]. In general, the shape of the liquid–vapor interface is determined by Young’s equation [ 29 ].…”
Section: Fundamental Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A hydrophobic surface enables a reagent to combine with a bioparticle or sample to form a droplet; the reagent can then be heated, cooled, and mixed by exerting a voltage on the droplet. The CA, which generally represents the wettability of a solid surface by a liquid, is defined by the angle between the liquid–vapor interface and solid–liquid interfaces [ 27 , 28 ]. In general, the shape of the liquid–vapor interface is determined by Young’s equation [ 29 ].…”
Section: Fundamental Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, to evaluate the wettability of nylon coatings treated and untreated with plasma, the contact angle was measured [32][33] via the sessile drop (10 µl) method using water as a liquid. The images were recorded with a Micro View 1000x digital microscope and the contact angle values were obtained from the geometric analysis of the images of drops using the software Image J (version 1.52p).…”
Section: Coating Characterization Of Plasma Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main drawbacks of these techniques is that the camera/telescope is tilted down (at 1-2 degrees from the horizon of the liquid sample), there is the need for a strong background light and there is an increase in the complexity of the approach to make the reading, due to the cylindrical shape and small size of the optical fiber used. In addition, particular skill is needed by the experimentalist to use the technique well and thus create reproducible and accurate results [18], [19]. However, from a review of the literature undertaken, it would appear that creating a sensor based on monitoring the CMH by using an optical fiber sensor emerging vertically from the air/liquid and from the liquid/liquid interfaces and then calculating the CA (all without the use of cameras), is innovative and this approach has not been investigated in any detail.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%