1984
DOI: 10.1016/0021-9797(84)90031-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contact angle variation on polymer surfaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The effect of electrocapillarity was explained by the mutual repulsion of like charge carriers at the aqueous side of the interface, which tends to increase the area of the interface . The influence of an electrostatic charge on the wetting of polymers by water has also been reported several times, , and the dependence of the contact angle on an electric field has been the object of several studies. In the 1930s, Frumkin et al investigated the contact angle of oil droplets on mercury in electrolyte solutions .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The effect of electrocapillarity was explained by the mutual repulsion of like charge carriers at the aqueous side of the interface, which tends to increase the area of the interface . The influence of an electrostatic charge on the wetting of polymers by water has also been reported several times, , and the dependence of the contact angle on an electric field has been the object of several studies. In the 1930s, Frumkin et al investigated the contact angle of oil droplets on mercury in electrolyte solutions .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…One of the greatest problems with Frumkin’s system - in terms of practicality - is that it involves a liquid mercury substrate, whereas similar voltages on most solid electrodes cause undesirable side effects, such as corrosion and electrolyte decomposition. In the late 1970s and early 1980s, interest in electrowetting was rekindled after it became clear that contact angles of sessile droplets can be controlled by changing the surface charge of polymer substrates. , This electrowetting-on-dielectric (EWOD) configuration made electrowetting on solids feasible for practical implementations. Sondaghuethorst and Fokkink showed that gold surfaces with an insulating alkane-thiol coating can deliver a stable electrowetting effect. , The thiol-coated system, although suffering from slow response times and large hysteresis, was also used by Whitesides et al who, to the best of our knowledge, introduced the term “liquid lens” to electrowetting research.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the late 1970s and early 1980s, interest in electrowetting was rekindled after it became clear that contact angles of sessile droplets can be controlled by changing the surface charge of polymer substrates. 9,10 This electrowetting-on-dielectric (EWOD) configuration made electrowetting on solids feasible for practical implementations. Sondaghuethorst and Fokkink showed that gold surfaces with an insulating alkane-thiol coating can deliver a stable electrowetting effect.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%