2019
DOI: 10.1088/1757-899x/471/6/062027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contact Conditions over Turnout Crossing Noses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…erefore, passing trains caused increased acceleration impulses due to interruption of the rail continuity as wheels of the train hit the crossing nose. In a case of a movable crossing that is used in some S&C designs especially for high-speed tracks, these impulses would be lower but still detectable [16].…”
Section: Data Acquisitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…erefore, passing trains caused increased acceleration impulses due to interruption of the rail continuity as wheels of the train hit the crossing nose. In a case of a movable crossing that is used in some S&C designs especially for high-speed tracks, these impulses would be lower but still detectable [16].…”
Section: Data Acquisitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A common numerical tool for whole turnout analyses is multi-body simulation (MBS) where the bodies are simulated by multi degrees of freedom, and the contact theories are used to estimate contact forces. In general, Hertzian, Non-Hertzian, or Multi-Hertzian contact theories have been adopted to calculate normal contact forces and Kalker's theories or Polach's method have been used for tangential forces [23,24]. The disadvantage of the MBS is the limitation of the accuracy of estimated contact forces.…”
Section: Geometry and Materials Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several wheel-rail contact theories are used to estimate normal and tangential contact forces in numerical analysis procedures [23,24]. Hertzian Contact Theory for normal forces and Kalker's Fastsim for tangential forces are the most common and easy-to-adopt contact theories.…”
Section: Wheel-rail Contact Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%