1969
DOI: 10.1115/1.3554920
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contact Conformity Effects on Spinning Torque and Friction

Abstract: Lubricated and unlubricated tests were conducted in the NASA spinning friction apparatus with SAE 52100 steel specimens with ball-race conformities of infinity (a ball on a flat), 60, 55, and 51-percent. For a constant conformity under lubricated conditions, the coefficient of spinning friction decreased from approximately 0.5 to 0.05 with increasing load and stress. At a constant stress, the coefficient of spinning friction increased with decreasing conformity (increasing percent conformity). Under unlubricat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1974
1974
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The resistance to this pivotal motion comes from the twisting of the contact region between the lower ball and the glass cylinder. For the present set of experimental parameters the contact region which is ≈10 µm is orders of magnitude smaller than the radius of the balls [16]. Hence the frictional resistance of the bottom ball to the pivoting motion will be negligible.…”
Section: (B) Explanationmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…The resistance to this pivotal motion comes from the twisting of the contact region between the lower ball and the glass cylinder. For the present set of experimental parameters the contact region which is ≈10 µm is orders of magnitude smaller than the radius of the balls [16]. Hence the frictional resistance of the bottom ball to the pivoting motion will be negligible.…”
Section: (B) Explanationmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…When Tribogyr is compared to devices found in the literature, it clearly appears with a much wider working range. The Zaretsky, et al apparatus (Parker,et al (10); Dietrich, et al (11); Allen, et al (12)) reaches high spin but the linear speed is still equal to zero. The continuously variable toroidal drive test rig of Lingard (13) and the disc-disc apparatus of Tevaarwerk (14) allowed quite high speeds but low spinning motions compared to the Tribogyr spin range; however, Lingard's apparatus and Tribogyr have a similar normal load capacity.…”
Section: Test Rig Presentationmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In the literature, the spin quantification is somehow questionable: some parameters defining the spin are proposed but none of them seems to give a relevant representation. Some authors directly used the normal rotational speed (in rpm or rad/s, as in Dietrich, et al (11), Allen, et al (12), and Lingard (13)) but this term does not take into account the contact geometry and thus it does not include variables that directly intervene in the physics of EHL. On the other hand, Gadallah and Dalmaz (15) and Colin et al (16) defined two parameters that take into account the mean entrainment velocity, the difference of the rotational speeds, and contact geometrical characteristics.…”
Section: Definition Of a Spin Parametermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With a spinning friction tester Parker et al [2] and Dietrich et al [3] experimentally investigated the friction under pure spinning conditions. The lubricated contact consisted of a steel bearing ball and a flat with a ground cylindrical groove on it.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%