1991
DOI: 10.1007/bf02327568
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contact force prediction and experimental verification on an OHC finger-follower-type cam-valuve system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A combined kinematic analysis of the mechanism with lubricated contact dynamics is then justified, as in the works reported in references [7,8,19,20]. However, at progressively increasing engine speeds, the spring surge effect becomes significant as shown by Kim et al [21], and thus a full non-linear dynamic analysis becomes necessary. At higher speeds, larger dynamic forces occur, yielding higher contact forces that can be quite beneficial as highlighted above.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…A combined kinematic analysis of the mechanism with lubricated contact dynamics is then justified, as in the works reported in references [7,8,19,20]. However, at progressively increasing engine speeds, the spring surge effect becomes significant as shown by Kim et al [21], and thus a full non-linear dynamic analysis becomes necessary. At higher speeds, larger dynamic forces occur, yielding higher contact forces that can be quite beneficial as highlighted above.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…He observed that profile errors can have a major impact on the dynamic performance of such high-speed follower cam systems. Kim et al (1991) used a lumped mass-springdamper to predict the dynamic behaviour of a cam-valve system that gives concordant results compared with experimental tests for the evaluation of contact forces in the system. Jeon et al (1989) stated in his paper that with experimental and simulation results that optimize a cam profile, he is able to increase the valve lift area, while reducing the cam acceleration and the peak pushrod force.…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three types of geometric tolerances exist: (1 ) cam profile tolerance (and finger follower profile tolerance); (2) cam eccentricity tolerance; and (3) perpendicularity tolerance of the valve stem. The corresponding dynamic model [10] and an interpretation of the geometric tolerance types are shown. The overall functional design requirements of this mechanism can be Figure 2.…”
Section: Sources Of Noisementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The overall functional design requirements of this mechanism can be Figure 2. A finger follower-type cam valve system [10], dynamic model, and geometnc tolerances. stated in terms of the functions performed by each component (sub-system).…”
Section: Sources Of Noisementioning
confidence: 99%