Etiologic investigations have focused primarily on the glenohumeral joint. Proposed etiologies include decreased capsular volume, 20,33 degenerative changes, 2,47 shoulder capsule adhesions, 1,30,31 synovitis, 14,46,47 and thickened synovium.
11,24These etiologic investigations have led to multiple alternative labels proposed in the literature. The most frequently cited are adhesive capsulitis and frozen shoulder. These labels are essentially interchangeable with idiopathic loss of shoulder ROM. Subjects with idiopathic loss of shoulder ROM consistently report decreased motion in multiple planes. 7,15,41 Frequent functional complaints include difficulty getting dressed, completing personal hygiene, 29 and performing tasks requiring overhead reaching. 15 Performance of these activities of daily living requires the combined and coordinated motions of the scapulothoracic and glenohumeral joints.The scapula links the humerus to the trunk. Scapulothoracic motion is necessary to achieve full humerus-to-trunk scapular plane elevation. Cathcart 6 was the first to recognize the scapulothoracic contribution to normal shoulder complex kinematics. He determined that the scapula moved on the thorax throughout humerus elevation. Many terms have been utilized to describe the movement of the scapula on the thorax. For consistency, this article will use terminology presented by Ludewig et al. 22 Upward/downward rotation occurs around an axis perpendicular to the plane of the scapula. Posterior/anterior tipping occurs around an axis approximately parallel to the spine of the scapula. Internal/external rotation occurs around a vertical axis.Scapular motion on the thorax dur-PETER J. RUNDQUIST, PT, PhD The condition affects 3% of the population. 32 Despite several authors' reports that the condition spontaneously resolves within 2 years, 7,13 subjects continue to report shoulder pain, stiffness, or both for up to 7 years.
MATERIALS AND METHODS:Seventeen unilaterally impaired and 17 nonimpaired subjects. The 3-dimensional motion of the humerus, scapula, and trunk were measured with the Fastrak electromagnetic motion-tracking system during humerus-to-trunk scapular plane elevation. An analysis of variance compared the impaired subjects noninvolved to the nonimpaired subjects' scapulae at 4 scapular plane elevation positions. A repeated-measures analysis of variance compared the impaired subjects' involved and noninvolved scapulae at 3 scapular plane elevation positions, and matched-pairs t test compared peak elevation values.
RESULTS:The between-group ANOVAs demonstrated no difference in anterior tipping, internal rotation, or upward rotation. The repeated-measures ANOVAs demonstrated no difference in anterior tipping or internal rotation and a position-by-side interaction in upward rotation. The involved-side scapulae were more upwardly rotated (7.7°) at peak humerus-to-trunk scapular plane elevation.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION:The impaired subjects' noninvolved scapular kinematics were not significantly different than the nonimpair...