2008
DOI: 10.1017/s0004972708000221
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CONTACT METRIC (κ,μ)-SPACES AS BI-LEGENDRIAN MANIFOLDS

Abstract: We describe a contact metric manifold whose Reeb vector field belongs to the (κ, µ)-nullity distribution as a bi-Legendrian manifold and we study its canonical bi-Legendrian structure. Then we characterize contact metric (κ, µ)-spaces in terms of a canonical connection which can be naturally defined on them.2000 Mathematics subject classification: 53C12, 53C15, 53C25.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Note also that since M 2n+1 is Sasakian and in particular K-contact, by Lemma 3.6, also Q is flat. Finally, we prove that * ∇ coincides with the bi-Legendrian connection corresponding to (L, Q), that is * ∇ verifies (ii) and (iii) in (6). The relations * T (X, ξ) = [ξ, X] Q for X ∈ Γ (L) and * T (Y, ξ) = [ξ, Y ] L for Y ∈ Γ (Q) hold because L and Q are flat and, on the other hand, * T (X, ξ) = φhX = 0, * T (Y, ξ) = φhY = 0.…”
Section: The Bi-legendrian and The Tanaka-webster Connectionmentioning
confidence: 68%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Note also that since M 2n+1 is Sasakian and in particular K-contact, by Lemma 3.6, also Q is flat. Finally, we prove that * ∇ coincides with the bi-Legendrian connection corresponding to (L, Q), that is * ∇ verifies (ii) and (iii) in (6). The relations * T (X, ξ) = [ξ, X] Q for X ∈ Γ (L) and * T (Y, ξ) = [ξ, Y ] L for Y ∈ Γ (Q) hold because L and Q are flat and, on the other hand, * T (X, ξ) = φhX = 0, * T (Y, ξ) = φhY = 0.…”
Section: The Bi-legendrian and The Tanaka-webster Connectionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Moreover, these Legendrian foliations are totally geodesic, hence they verify (i)-(iv) of Proposition 2.9. This bi-Legendrian structure and the corresponding bi-Legendrian connection has been studied in detail in [6] where in particular it is proved that D (λ) and D (−λ) are never both flat.…”
Section: Proposition 25 ([4])mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our case the explicit expressions of ΠscriptDfalse(λfalse) and ΠscriptDfalse(λfalse) are (see [, p. 127] or ): normalΠD(λ)=(λ+1)2kμλλg|D(λ)×D(λ), normalΠD(λ)=(λ1)2+kμλλg|D(λ)×D(λ).Using the previous equations one gets (see ): Theorem Let (M,φ,ξ,η,g) be a non‐Sasakian contact metric (k,μ)‐manifold. Then one of the following must hold: both D(λ) and D(λ) are positive definite; D(λ) is positive definite and D(λ) is negative definite; both D(λ) and …”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The Legendre foliation  is called positive, negative or flat according to the circumstance that the bilinear form  is positive definite, negative definite or vanishes identically, respectively. In our case the explicit expressions of ( ) and (− ) are (see [1, p. 127] or [7]):…”
Section: Contact Metric ( )-Manifoldsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first class consists of the unit tangent sphere bundles of spaces of constant curvature, equipped with their natural contact metric structure and the second class contains all the threedimensional unimodular Lie groups, except the commutative one, admitting the structure of a left invariant ) ( ,   -contact metric manifolds [4], [5], [13]. One of the peculiarities of these manifolds is that its tangent space give rise to three mutually orthogonal distributions corresponding to the eigenspaces of M so that these manifolds are endowed with a bi-Legendrian structure [11]. This is why the distributions of ) , (   -contact metric manifolds are seemed to the interesting as a field of study.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%