2016
DOI: 10.1590/1413-70542016403001716
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contact pressures and the impact of farm equipment on Latosol with the presence and absence of sugarcane straw

Abstract: High contact pressures applied to soil result in a greater degree of compaction, in addition to promoting other negative effects. The objective of this study was to quantify contact areas by using different methodologies, and pressures of farm equipment employed in production activity and evaluate structural changes caused in a Red Latosol with the presence and absence of straw cover. The design was completely randomized in a factorial scheme of type 4 (tire on front axle, tire on rear axle, tire on a sugarcan… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
15

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
12
0
15
Order By: Relevance
“…The susceptibility of soils to compaction and the extent of soil compaction can be evaluated with different properties of the soil, such as bulk density, porosity, penetration resistance, hydraulic conductivity (Ampoorter et al, 2010;Silva et al, 2011;Moreira et al, 2012;Braga et al, 2013;Lopes et al, 2015;Silva et al, 2016), and more recently, the precompression stress (Araujo-Junior et al, 2011;Figueiredo et al, 2011;Pacheco;Cantalice, 2011;Ajayi et al, 2013). Precompression stress is generally considered as (a) an indicator of the soil mechanical strength (Ajayi et al, 2013); (b) the maximum pressure that should be applied to the soil to prevent compaction (Severiano et al, 2010;Araujo-Junior et al, 2011), and (c) the required pressure by the root system to enable the root elongation (Iori et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The susceptibility of soils to compaction and the extent of soil compaction can be evaluated with different properties of the soil, such as bulk density, porosity, penetration resistance, hydraulic conductivity (Ampoorter et al, 2010;Silva et al, 2011;Moreira et al, 2012;Braga et al, 2013;Lopes et al, 2015;Silva et al, 2016), and more recently, the precompression stress (Araujo-Junior et al, 2011;Figueiredo et al, 2011;Pacheco;Cantalice, 2011;Ajayi et al, 2013). Precompression stress is generally considered as (a) an indicator of the soil mechanical strength (Ajayi et al, 2013); (b) the maximum pressure that should be applied to the soil to prevent compaction (Severiano et al, 2010;Araujo-Junior et al, 2011), and (c) the required pressure by the root system to enable the root elongation (Iori et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Após o tráfego da escavadeira hidráulica adaptada na camada de 0 a 0,10 m, a resistência do solo à penetração apresentou aumento médio de 39%, enquanto após o tráfego do harvester de pneus, o aumento foi de 77% na mesma camada. Essa susceptibilidade na camada de 0 a 0,10 m de profundidade também foi relatada Silva et al (2016). Além disso, estudo de Ampoorter et al (2010) relatam que as alterações físicas do solo tendem a ser mais intensas logo abaixo da linha de tráfego das máquinas.…”
Section: Resultsunclassified
“…According to Severiano et al (2010), the adoption of preventive measures to avoid additional soil compaction by mechanical sugarcane harvesting is recommended, including the control of pressure level per axle of the machine (Bennett et al, 2015), as well as, control of the inflating pressure of tires and increasing the number of axles of trailers, reducing thus the load applied on soil by the machine. Traffic over crop residues has also been suggested as a preven- tive measure, in addition to monitoring soil moisture to perform agricultural driving at moisture contents below the limit (Silva et al, 2016). These preventive traffic control measures (Sousa et al, 2017) may be a promising alternative to avoid the spread of soil compaction throughout the entire sugarcane cultivation area.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%