2010
DOI: 10.1063/1.3491804
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contact resistivity and current flow path at metal/graphene contact

Abstract: The contact properties between metal and graphene were examined. The electrical measurement on a multiprobe device with different contact areas revealed that the current flow preferentially entered graphene at the edge of the contact metal. The analysis using the cross-bridge Kelvin structure (CBK) suggested that a transition from the edge conduction to area conduction occurred for a contact length shorter than the transfer length of ~1 μm. The contact resistivity for Ni was measured as ~5×10 -6 Ωcm 2 using th… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

25
279
3

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 299 publications
(307 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
25
279
3
Order By: Relevance
“…One of the outstanding questions is the magnitude of the contact resistance between graphene and metal electrodes since a high contact resistance will limit the performance of field-effect transistors. 1 There have been several experimental investigations of the contact resistance of the metal-graphene interface using four-or two-probe measurements [2][3][4][5][6] and the transfer length method, 3,7 however, currently there is no clear consensus on the value and the dependence of the contact resistance on contact area, temperature, and applied gate potential. Thus, there is a need for complementary theoretical studies, which can give insight about the physical mechanism at play at the metal-graphene interface.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the outstanding questions is the magnitude of the contact resistance between graphene and metal electrodes since a high contact resistance will limit the performance of field-effect transistors. 1 There have been several experimental investigations of the contact resistance of the metal-graphene interface using four-or two-probe measurements [2][3][4][5][6] and the transfer length method, 3,7 however, currently there is no clear consensus on the value and the dependence of the contact resistance on contact area, temperature, and applied gate potential. Thus, there is a need for complementary theoretical studies, which can give insight about the physical mechanism at play at the metal-graphene interface.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previously, we determined the transfer length d T ( / , where  C is the specific contact resistivity and R ch is the sheet resistance of graphene underneath the metal electrode) as ~0.5-1 m at the graphene/Ni contact region. 4 This is the effective length for the current injection at the graphene/Ni interface, as shown in Fig. 1.…”
Section: Extraction Of Conductance Modulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11 Experimentally, the band structure of graphene grown on a Ni substrate has been confirmed to differ from that of the pristine graphene. 12 Therefore, the Fermi level of graphene is assumed to be fixed at the graphene/metal interface as mentioned above, especially for chemisorption metals.However, in the conventional back-gate graphene FET device, a dependence of the contact resistivity at the Ni/graphene contact on V G has been observed, 4 suggesting that the carrier density in the graphene underneath the metal could be modulated by V G , even though the graphene electrically contacts the metal. 13 This carrier density modulation was first proposed for Ti/Pd/Au contacts because the drain current at the DP increases with increasing V G , even for a graphene FET device in which the entire channel region is completely covered by the topgate.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations