Contact Theory in a Small-Town Settler-Colonial Context

Abstract

This article builds on group position theory and the subcategorization model of intergroup contact by illustrating how, in a small-town settler-colonial context, contact tends to reproduce, rather than challenge, the inequitable racial structure. In Northwestern Ontario, Indigenous-settler relations are characterized by widespread intergroup marriage and friendship as well as pervasive prejudice and discrimination. Using 18 months of fieldwork and 160 interviews and surveys with First Nations, Métis, and non-Indigenous residents, I show that although contact is associated with less “old-fashioned” prejudice (i.e., overt categorical hostility), it does not necessarily eliminate whites’ superior sense of group position. Even white individuals who have close Indigenous friends or spouses often express laissez-faire racism. Three mutually reinforcing social processes—subtyping, ideology-based homophily, and political avoidance norms—interact to sustain whites’ sense of group superiority and justifications for racial inequity. These processes are facilitated by historical and structural conditions, in this case colonization and small-town dynamics.

The contact hypothesis during the European refugee crisis: Relating quality and quantity of (in)direct intergroup contact to attitudes towards refugees

“…In view of the above, studies testing the contact hypothesis should consider the frequency and valence of the intergroup contact. Although many studies indicate that direct intergroup contact reduces prejudice, others suggest that the effect of contact is selective (Denis, 2015;Jackman & Crane, 1986).…”

Traumatic Experiences, Perceived Discrimination, and Psychological Distress Among Members of Various Socially Marginalized Groups

“…It has been suggested that Indigenous peoples continue to be the most disadvantaged group in Canada, with instances of racism described as being ‘alarmingly high’ (Morrison et al, 2014; Statistics Canada, 2015). Indigenous communities and resources continue to be overseen by federal legislation (The Indian Act), and efforts to achieve equality and compensation for historical injustices, and their active exercise of treaty rights, are opposed by many non-Indigenous Canadians (Denis, 2015). In addition, they suffer disproportionate rates of physical illnesses (diabetes, HIV/AIDS, hepatitis, severe respiratory illnesses) and mental health disturbances (depression, posttraumatic stress, drug and alcohol addiction, suicide) (Kirmayer, 2014).…”

Immigration, Discrimination, and Trust: A Simply Complex Relationship

“…7 It is worth noting that the logical presentation of the categories normalizes white Canadian as the "norm" from which all others deviate. 8 Given the current and historical context of Indigenous-Canada relations (e.g., see Taiaiake, 1999;Ramos, 2006;Denis, 2015) the qualification should be made that the reported rates might have been higher for Indigenous people had a specific question been asked about discrimination related to being Indigenous. Further is that any such question might get at overt discrimination but not colonization.…”