2019
DOI: 10.1177/2514848619862191
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contact zones: Multispecies scholarship through Imperial Eyes

Abstract: The contact zone is described as the space of imperial encounter. Against a backdrop of work that has used Mary Louise Pratt's concept of the contact zone to examine culture-making, and destabilize normative understandings of division, distinction, and bordering, the paper interrogates the value of utilizing the concept in multispecies contexts. To do so, the paper considers the relationship between the contact zone and the concept of encounter, noting how they overlap and depart as approaches to questioning e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This call is being answered. Recent work explicitly engages the political, through gender (Doubleday and Adams, 2019; Must and Hovorka, 2019; Patchin, 2020), justice (Brown et al, 2019; Pitas and Shcheglovitova, 2019), capital (Barua, 2019; Klein, 2019; Satizábal and Dressler, 2019), biopolitics (Margulies, 2019a; Wakefield, 2019; Wrigley, 2018) and the ongoing consequences of colonialism (Bluwstein, 2018; Isaacs and Otruba, 2019; Margulies, 2019a; Pratt, 2019; Wilson, 2019). Second, as in other fields of geography, relational approaches are being widely applied in animal geographies.…”
Section: Further Questions: Political and Relationalmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This call is being answered. Recent work explicitly engages the political, through gender (Doubleday and Adams, 2019; Must and Hovorka, 2019; Patchin, 2020), justice (Brown et al, 2019; Pitas and Shcheglovitova, 2019), capital (Barua, 2019; Klein, 2019; Satizábal and Dressler, 2019), biopolitics (Margulies, 2019a; Wakefield, 2019; Wrigley, 2018) and the ongoing consequences of colonialism (Bluwstein, 2018; Isaacs and Otruba, 2019; Margulies, 2019a; Pratt, 2019; Wilson, 2019). Second, as in other fields of geography, relational approaches are being widely applied in animal geographies.…”
Section: Further Questions: Political and Relationalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Researchers engage relationality as an explicit conceptual and/or methodological approach, advancing thinking in the discipline (e.g. Gandy, 2019; Miller, 2018; Robertson and Ljubicic, 2019; Srinivasan, 2019; Wilson, 2019), and also as a broader empirical focus, through, for example, studies of the composition and functioning of cities, landscapes and oceans (e.g. Fredriksen, 2019; Satizábal and Dressler, 2019; Serrano-Montes et al, 2019; Tănăsescu, 2019; Wood, 2019).…”
Section: Further Questions: Political and Relationalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such encounters would not happen today as mass tourism became the norm over the years. The transition from a wild place to a tourist attraction eventually reestablished some of the asymmetry of power between animals and humans, between former colonials and western imperialisms [ 26 , 27 ], because tourists and even volunteers, paying high fees for the privilege to be with orang-utans [ 28 ] expected and even insisted on interacting with orang-utans. By this insistence and monetary contract, rehabilitant orang-utans were transformed into attractive products for the travel industry.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clearly, the orang-utan years had provided an entry point to animals and nature in general or indeed to a multi-species “contact zone” [ 25 , 27 ] that, once entered, cannot ever be left behind or unimagined. No doubt, these experiences may have altered my thinking and in ways that had not been consciously processed.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike a previous emphasis on protecting "ecosystem services that underpin our economy" (European Commission 2011), the EU's newer biodiversity strategy acknowledges the importance of formulating the question of risk through a more distinctly multispecies lens. Nature here is interpreted less as a "service" (implying a use value and normative status of no independent significance) and more as a community comprised of "companion species" who encounter one another in spaces traditionally marked by coercion, exploitation and neglect (i.e., contact zones) (Wilson 2008). 2 With a clear shift in focus towards planetary "co-presence", the realization is that protecting biodiversity means acknowledging the role of multispecies agents in finding "solutions" to "looming existential threats" (United Nations International Day for Biological Diversity 2020).…”
Section: Political Communication On the Loss Of Biological Diversity mentioning
confidence: 99%