2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.ndteint.2008.10.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contactless recognition of concrete surface damage from laser scanning and curvature computation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
59
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 100 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
59
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, LiDAR is used for collecting point clouds. LiDAR-based methods are highly accurate and able to detect the depth of the defects [3,10,11] and mass losses [12,13,14]. Although the initial cost of the LiDAR is high, it is a time and cost effective method in the long term [3].…”
Section: Methods For Surface Defects Inspectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, LiDAR is used for collecting point clouds. LiDAR-based methods are highly accurate and able to detect the depth of the defects [3,10,11] and mass losses [12,13,14]. Although the initial cost of the LiDAR is high, it is a time and cost effective method in the long term [3].…”
Section: Methods For Surface Defects Inspectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Observation of existing works on detecting surface damage of the bridge structures is summarized in Table 2. As an example Figure 3 shows work by Teza et al [26] using a Gaussian curvature in sub-areas of the dataset to recognise damaged area. In this work, the sub-area is considered damage if the standard deviation of the Gaussian curvature in this sub-area was greater than ones of the reference area.…”
Section: Surface Defectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The addition of intensity data to the geometric data has proved useful in several applications [19,26,27] and a study by Teza et al [20] showed a successful method based on curvature analysis of TLS geometric data and aimed at recognizing surface defects of a concrete bridge due to mass loss. However, laser scanner intensity data is not often utilised, because it is affected by several factors such as scanning distance and incidence angle, water content, ambient light, humidity, type of laser and object surface properties [21,22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%