2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.ribaf.2006.05.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contagion effect in financial markets after the South-East Asia Tsunami

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
37
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, market uncertainty (volatility) is still a topic worthy of further investigation. Note that, for investors, high market volatility will severely limit the well-established benefits of portfolio diversification, an ideal investment practice for the global tourism industry, especially at the international level (Lee, Wu, & Wang, 2007;McAleer, 2015). Moreover, this short-term transient effect seems to be inconsistent with some recent calls (see, for example, Chesney et al, 2011) to avoid investing in hospitality and tourism related stocks due to terrorist-related incidents.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, market uncertainty (volatility) is still a topic worthy of further investigation. Note that, for investors, high market volatility will severely limit the well-established benefits of portfolio diversification, an ideal investment practice for the global tourism industry, especially at the international level (Lee, Wu, & Wang, 2007;McAleer, 2015). Moreover, this short-term transient effect seems to be inconsistent with some recent calls (see, for example, Chesney et al, 2011) to avoid investing in hospitality and tourism related stocks due to terrorist-related incidents.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 From the empirical literature, the tranquil period is always longer than the turmoil period. For instance it is longer by a year, ten and a half months and nine months in Forbes & Rigobon (2002), Collins & Biekpe (2003) and Lee et al (2007) respectively. 7 According to this definition, the presence of high correlation between two markets during the stable period and eventually a sustained increase in the high degree of cross market co-movements at the turmoil period does not amount to contagion.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…From the same lens, if the high correlation degree is not significant, the term "interdependence" is used to describe the situation. Collins and Biekpe (2003) and Lee et al (2007) have applied the ttest and F-test respectively for the significance of difference in correlations. As recently pointed out by Asongu (2011), when only one coefficient is to be estimated, both tests have the same implications.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mostly applied are cross-market correlation coefficient measures (King and Wadhwani, 1990;Forbes and Rigobon, 2002;Collins and Biekpe, 2003;Lee et al, 2007;Asongu, 2011b), cross-market cointegration vector changing procedures (Kanas, 1998), volatility analysis based on ARCH and GARCH techniques (King et al, 1994) and direct estimation transmission mechanisms (Forbes, 2000).…”
Section: Literature On the Measure Of Contagionmentioning
confidence: 99%