2018
DOI: 10.1049/iet-cta.2017.1043
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Containment control for high‐order multi‐agent systems with heterogeneous time delays

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From (23) and (24), by exploiting the boundedness of the communication time-delay and by differentiating both V 2 (x(t )) and V 3 (x(t )) along the trajectories of the closed-loop system, we obtain:…”
Section: Theoremmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From (23) and (24), by exploiting the boundedness of the communication time-delay and by differentiating both V 2 (x(t )) and V 3 (x(t )) along the trajectories of the closed-loop system, we obtain:…”
Section: Theoremmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, it is more interesting to study the time‐varying formation control problem based on the discrete‐time model and to design the discretised formation controller [30, 31]. The time‐varying formation control problems for discrete‐time multi‐agent systems with communication delays [32–36] and switching topology [37–41] are investigated extensively. In [35], a Katz‐centrality‐based protocol is developed for the formation problem of second‐order discrete‐time multi‐agent systems with time‐varying transmission delay.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [35], a Katz‐centrality‐based protocol is developed for the formation problem of second‐order discrete‐time multi‐agent systems with time‐varying transmission delay. In [36], heterogeneous time delays in the formation control problem for high‐order discrete‐time multi‐agent systems are taken into account. In [40], the robust formation control problem for non‐linear discrete‐time multi‐agent systems with the switching topology and the initial formation error is presented.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a complex-valued neural networks with time-varying delay, a waiting-time-based event-triggered scheme was designed and an exponential decay term was introduced to ensure the global stabilization in Wang et al (2020). For high-order MASs that were discrete-time, the containment problem with heterogeneous communication delays was concerned in Wang et al (2018) and Li, et al (2019). In Xiao et al (2018), the linear matrix inequality method was applied into formation control for general linear MASs comprising both time-varying delays and switching topologies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%