Proceedings of the 4th Annual ACM Web Science Conference 2012
DOI: 10.1145/2380718.2380746
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Containment of misinformation spread in online social networks

Abstract: With their blistering expansions in recent years, popular online social sites such as Twitter, Facebook and Bebo, have become some of the major news sources as well as the most effective channels for viral marketing nowadays. However, alongside these promising features comes the threat of misinformation propagation which can lead to undesirable effects, such as the widespread panic in the general public due to faulty swine flu tweets on Twitter in 2009. Due to the huge magnitude of online social network (OSN) … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
83
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 189 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
83
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…To see that (15) and (16) do not dominate one another, we show that the RHS for one constraint need not always be larger than the RHS for the other constraint. For x = (0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0), note that the RHS of inequality (15) is 5, while the RHS for (16) is 6.…”
Section: Theorem 4 Consider a Spread Network Gx(vx Ax) For Which Thementioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To see that (15) and (16) do not dominate one another, we show that the RHS for one constraint need not always be larger than the RHS for the other constraint. For x = (0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0), note that the RHS of inequality (15) is 5, while the RHS for (16) is 6.…”
Section: Theorem 4 Consider a Spread Network Gx(vx Ax) For Which Thementioning
confidence: 89%
“…The authors assume that if good and bad information simultaneously arrive at a node, the good information will be adopted, and that the set of nodes spreading misinformation is known a priori. Nguyen et al [15] study the problem of finding a smallest set of nodes from which good influence serves to contain the spread of misinformation. They investigate both the case in which the originating nodes that spread misinformation are known, and the case in which they are unknown.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An analysis of the counter measures proposed and modeled in the literature against the spread of misinformation in OSNs are at times not in consonance with the effectiveness of the measures as suggested in studies of cognitive psychology. Theoretical framework for limiting the viral propagation of misinformation has been proposed in [12,13]. The authors have proposed a model for identifying the most influential nodes whose decontamination with good information would prevent the spread of misinformation.…”
Section: Countering the Spread Of Misinformationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They assume that each node's influence propagation is limited to the community it resides and thus they evaluate the influence propagation within each community to improve the computational efficiency. There are also many works for influence propagation or other social network applications taking the advantage of community structures (please see e.g., [42][43][44][45] for recent works).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%