2007
DOI: 10.1007/s00264-007-0429-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Containment versus impingement: finding a compromise for cup placement in total hip arthroplasty

Abstract: Recommendations for cup containment and impingement may provide conflicting directions for component orientation in total hip arthroplasty. For optimal containment, the cup is positioned with respect to the acetabular bone, resulting in coincidence of the rim of the cup and the acetabulum. This results in good coverage and symmetric load transfer, leading to good long-term stability, but occasionally necessitates more abduction of the cup than that recommended by the safe zone. On the other hand, placement of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
70
0
5

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
70
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…When considering the concept of cup ''safe'' zones [48,79], implant positioning was certainly suboptimal in our cases [41]. Thus, our assumption that such wear patterns were indeed ''normal'' may be incorrect.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…When considering the concept of cup ''safe'' zones [48,79], implant positioning was certainly suboptimal in our cases [41]. Thus, our assumption that such wear patterns were indeed ''normal'' may be incorrect.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…However, the anatomic features of the acetabulum are not reflected, so cup containment (bone coverage) might not be achieved using this approach. 4 Yet other studies support cup implantation closely matching the individual's original acetabular anatomy. 7,9 With such an anatomic reconstruction technique, the cup is implanted according to the original position, for which the TAL is a good anatomic landmark.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 Bone impingement between the anterior acetabulum and femur may occur in excessive bone coverage, whereas insufficient bone coverage leads to psoas-impingement at the anterior rim of the cup. 4 Reconstruction of the original individual anatomy of the hip joint may provide desirable postoperative outcomes in THA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ROM of THA is known to be determined by two major factors: implant design variables (head/neck ratio, cup design, and oscillation angle) and the surgical orientation of the prosthetic components (cup inclination, cup anteversion, angle of femoral neck component from the horizontal plane, and femoral neck anteversion) [9]. Use of a larger femoral head provides an increase in the oscillation ROM range of motion, ADL activities of daily living, Flex flexion, Abd abduction, ER external rotation, Inc inclination, Ant anteversion, P values for parameters were determined using the Mann-Whitney test angle.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%