1996
DOI: 10.1016/0043-1354(95)00187-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contaminant fluxes from sediment due to tubificid oligochaete bioturbation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

8
99
1
1

Year Published

1996
1996
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 121 publications
(109 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
8
99
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, large variations in population densities are common between areas (Perus & Bonsdorff 2004). This variation should be taken into consideration when interpreting the results, since bioturbation intensity has been positively correlated with both size and abundance of infauna (Reible et al 1996, Sandnes et al 2000.Input of labile OM can increase the mobilisation of contaminants from the sediment surface. This may be the result of a combined effect of increased animal feeding and bioturbation activity, and a high diagenetic release due to OM degradation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, large variations in population densities are common between areas (Perus & Bonsdorff 2004). This variation should be taken into consideration when interpreting the results, since bioturbation intensity has been positively correlated with both size and abundance of infauna (Reible et al 1996, Sandnes et al 2000.Input of labile OM can increase the mobilisation of contaminants from the sediment surface. This may be the result of a combined effect of increased animal feeding and bioturbation activity, and a high diagenetic release due to OM degradation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bioturbation by conveyor-belt feeders is achieved by the continuous movement of buried sediment particles to the surface through ingestion and defecation processes, resulting in considerable amounts of contaminants being transported to the sedimentwater interface (Green and Chandler, 1994;Karickhoff and Morris, 1985;Koelmans and Jonker, 2011;Reible et al, 1996). For instance, the presence of Tubificid oligochaetes in sediment increased HOC concentrations in overlying water 4-6 folds (Karickhoff and Morris, 1985).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, the activities of organisms also affect the fate, transport, and bioavailability of sediment-associated contaminants (Green and Chandler, 1994;Reible et al, 1996;Thibodeaux and Bierman, 2003). Oligochaetes have been frequently used as the model organisms to study bioturbation, as they have been noted as organisms that highly contribute to the bioturbation in freshwater systems (Bosworth and Thibodeaux, 1990;Thibodeaux and Bierman, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accordingly, the sludge conveyed to the settling pond is usually removed once a year, which means that the sludge might be subjected for a long period not only to resuspension and/or hydrolysis by bacteria, but also to other biological activities such as bioturbation. Bioturbation carried out by benthic organisms (such as chironomid laravaes or tubificid worms) is defined as the sediment processing by animals during burrowing, sediment ingestion/defecation, tube building and biodeposition (Reible et al, 1996). As a result of bioturbation the sediment particles and pore water is subjected to a vertical and horizontal movement that leads to the mixing of upper sediment surface (Robins et al, 1979;Robins, 1982).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%