2006
DOI: 10.1007/s10646-005-0043-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contamination and Biomarkers in the Great Blue Heron, an Indicator of the State of the St. Lawrence River

Abstract: In 1996-1997, nine breeding colonies of the great blue heron on the St. Lawrence River and its estuary (Québec, Canada) were investigated in the framework of a biomonitoring program. Fledglings from colonies in freshwater were more contaminated with mercury, PCBs and many organic contaminants than those from estuarine colonies. The level of contamination in the St. Lawrence River is generally below the levels of toxicological effects for the great blue heron. The molar ratio of retinol: retinyl palmitate in he… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
8
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The levels measured were below those associated with detrimental effects [3,23]. Total PCB levels showed no spatial differences as well as no significant difference compared to our previous study [9]. However, the PCB levels were notably low at Dickerson Island, which is located close to three major U.S. superfund sites known as major PCB sources in Massena, New York, USA [24].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 59%
“…The levels measured were below those associated with detrimental effects [3,23]. Total PCB levels showed no spatial differences as well as no significant difference compared to our previous study [9]. However, the PCB levels were notably low at Dickerson Island, which is located close to three major U.S. superfund sites known as major PCB sources in Massena, New York, USA [24].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 59%
“…They respond more quickly to environmental changes, show their occurrence through vocalization, and are easy to detect and identify [4,34,35]. Previously, seabirds have been used as a bioindicators of pollution [36][37][38][39], oil spills [40,41], contamination in the Antarctic ecosystem [42][43][44], evaluate wetland ecosystem health [45,46], climate change [47], primary productivity [48], and environmental pollution in aquatic system [49][50][51]. This could be that, seabirds may show distinctive habitat preferences and display a variety of adaptations to exploit the marine resources and can be used to determine the marine ecosystem integrity.…”
Section: Seabirds As Bioindicators Of Marine Ecosystemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As large fish eating birds, they assume the highest trophic level in aquatic ecosystems. Since they have the ability to accumulate pollutants and heavy metals that are non bio degradable [8], they can be used as biomonitors to assess the pollutant levels in aquatic systems [9][10][11][12]. Also, the changing levels of pollutants within lower tropic levels can also be mapped using these indicators [13,14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%