2003
DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410x.2003.04407.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contamination by opportunistic screening in the European Randomized Study of Prostate Cancer Screening

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
34
0
3

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
34
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…As a result, the men using cholesterol-lowering medication are probably more active users of health services, which could result also in more frequent serum PSA determinations and digital rectal examinations. Because routine prostate cancer screening with the PSA test is not recommended in Finland and the prevalence of opportunistic screening is <20% annually (31), it is plausible that more latent prostate cancers are found among the medication users due to more active PSA testing compared with nonusers. This would falsely increase the observed OR of the overall prostate cancer for medication users and mask a possible protective effect of medication use.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, the men using cholesterol-lowering medication are probably more active users of health services, which could result also in more frequent serum PSA determinations and digital rectal examinations. Because routine prostate cancer screening with the PSA test is not recommended in Finland and the prevalence of opportunistic screening is <20% annually (31), it is plausible that more latent prostate cancers are found among the medication users due to more active PSA testing compared with nonusers. This would falsely increase the observed OR of the overall prostate cancer for medication users and mask a possible protective effect of medication use.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the latter, then an inverse association with total prostate cancer should have been observed in the Finnish study with the low prevalence of PSA testing (7% in 1996 and 14% in 1999; ref. 21) versus >70% in the three U.S. cohorts. To the contrary, a very weak positive association was noted for statins and total prostate cancer (odds ratio, 1.07; 95% confidence interval, 1.00-1.13), the confidence interval for which was not compatible with an inverse association.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian (PLCO) trial about half of the patients in the screening group had already been tested at least once with either PSA or DRE (3). In the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC), contamination was lower (ranging from 8.6% to 36.6%) (4,22). Regarding pre-screened men rates, in our study illiterate men had lower probability to have had a previous prostatic evaluation compared with more educated patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 65%