2022
DOI: 10.1007/s00428-021-03263-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contamination of personal protective equipment during COVID-19 autopsies

Abstract: Confronted with an emerging infectious disease at the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, the medical community faced concerns regarding the safety of autopsies on those who died of the disease. This attitude has changed, and autopsies are now recognized as indispensable tools for understanding COVID-19, but the true risk of infection to autopsy staff is nevertheless still debated. To clarify the rate of SARS-CoV-2 contamination in personal protective equipment (PPE), swabs were taken at nine points in the PPE… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(41 reference statements)
1
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The safety of the procedure for viral contamination was tested by using multiple swabs at the end of each US-MIA. Except for one positive swab from the ultrasound transducer that had been in direct contact with the deceased patient's puncture sites, all other swabs were virus-negative, which is in accordance with a previous study on the risk of SARS-CoV-2 contamination during autopsies of COVID-19 patients [32]. The diagnostic output of our bedside US-MIA revealed COVID-19-specific and non-specific organ pathologies similar to those detected by conventional autopsies.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The safety of the procedure for viral contamination was tested by using multiple swabs at the end of each US-MIA. Except for one positive swab from the ultrasound transducer that had been in direct contact with the deceased patient's puncture sites, all other swabs were virus-negative, which is in accordance with a previous study on the risk of SARS-CoV-2 contamination during autopsies of COVID-19 patients [32]. The diagnostic output of our bedside US-MIA revealed COVID-19-specific and non-specific organ pathologies similar to those detected by conventional autopsies.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…COVID-19 is the most important health challenge today and the adherence to control strategies to contain the spread of the virus is a global priority. Even if there is no consensus on the spread of the virus from the deceased person, the careful management of the bodies is mandatory, considering that the rate of contamination of personal protective equipment after full autopsies varies between 15% and 65% [4,5]. Nevertheless, this viewpoint underlines that there is no consensus on the practices and techniques for the autopsy and for the management of the body for the funeral services.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the vaccination campaign progressing successfully, our battle is not yet won, and avoiding exposure to this virus is crucial to preventing COVID-19. Person-to-person transmission occurs primarily via direct contact or through droplets spread by the infected individual coughing or sneezing [3][4][5]. Although the infection rate from dead bodies is unclear [4], managing them is of great importance in reducing viral transmission, especially because mortuary staff and pathologists will be exposed to potentially infective materials from cadavers, transmitted through airways, body bags, autopsy tables, and autopsy room walls [4,6].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fälle einer postmortalen Übertragung von Sars-CoV-2 oder Influenzaviren auf Obduktionspersonal sind bislang nicht bekannt geworden, allerdings wurden infektiöse SARS-CoV-2-Partikel an der persönlichen Schutzausrüstung von Obduzentinnen nachgewiesen [9], sodass die Möglichkeit einer Ansteckung unbedingt berücksichtigt werden muss. Präventiv sind das effektive Lüften, das Tragen von Schutzmasken (mindestens FFP2) und -brillen sowie die Händehygiene wirksam.…”
Section: Schweres-akutes-atemwegssyndrom-coronavirus Typ 2 (Risikogru...unclassified