2015
DOI: 10.1080/0161956x.2015.1022112
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contemporary Federal Education Policy and Rural Schools: A Critical Policy Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
45
0
6

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
45
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Myriad barriers to building effective school-based mental infrastructure in rural settings exist, some of which originate at the federal policy level. Johnson and Howley (2015) noted that although rural schools are markedly different from nonrural schools along several dimensions, federal policies guiding the distribution of resources to schools often do not account for these differences, and few national policies designed specifically for rural schools account for heterogeneity in the rural context (i.e., geographical region, community demographics).…”
Section: Rural Schools: Special Circumstances Unique Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Myriad barriers to building effective school-based mental infrastructure in rural settings exist, some of which originate at the federal policy level. Johnson and Howley (2015) noted that although rural schools are markedly different from nonrural schools along several dimensions, federal policies guiding the distribution of resources to schools often do not account for these differences, and few national policies designed specifically for rural schools account for heterogeneity in the rural context (i.e., geographical region, community demographics).…”
Section: Rural Schools: Special Circumstances Unique Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But we are unaware of studies that directly examine how SWD and ELL teachers experience policies in comparison with general educators and how their use of standards in the classroom differs from other teachers. We also compare urban, suburban, and rural teachers, given economic and geographic differences that may influence the policy environment (Johnson & Howley, 2015). For example, rural districts face unique administrative challenges in standards implementation; they enact policy across wider geographic areas with fewer staff and resources (Yettick, Baker, Wickersham, & Hupfield, 2014).…”
Section: Importance Of the Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That change can be effected only by those in a position to influence the development or implementation of policy. As Johnson and Howley (2015) noted, in some cases, such as in rural settings, critical policy analysis may have more implications for teachers than for policy makers. The same may be true of arts education, because policy makers understand little of arts education.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CPA has been applied to studies of rural schools, which researchers note are inherently different than urban and suburban schools. Johnson and Howley (2015) noted that those differences are contrary to policy makers' idealized, industrialized vision for American education. They acknowledged that, particularly for rural issues, CPA may do more for teachers than for policymakers.…”
Section: Framework: Critical Approaches In Education Policy Analysismentioning
confidence: 92%