2013
DOI: 10.1053/j.otsm.2012.10.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contemporary Graft Options in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
(98 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…24 The ability to offer decreased donor site morbidity with a high biomechanical strength profile and no significant difference in rerupture rates has made HT an attractive option. 6,25 What is less known are outcomes regarding HT ACL reconstruction within high-level football players.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…24 The ability to offer decreased donor site morbidity with a high biomechanical strength profile and no significant difference in rerupture rates has made HT an attractive option. 6,25 What is less known are outcomes regarding HT ACL reconstruction within high-level football players.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering the average length of the PT observed in this study (which is lower than the required 70 mm graft length required for an ACL reconstruction [ 38 ]), with the incorporation of bone blocks it means that most individuals may still be considered suitable recipients of a PT autograft. The benefit associated with using the BPTB graft is that it incorporates and heals at a much faster rate within the bone tunnels thus affirming its popularity in ACL reconstruction [ 39 , 40 ]. Apart from the benefits of a BPTB, graft site morbidity and return of tendon and knee functions are the other important factors to consider before deciding on harvesting tissues e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At 80% statistical power and a significance level of 5%, the minimum sample size required was 42 cadavers (i.e., 21 cadavers per sex). Thus, the final sample size considered in this study was 40…”
Section: Demographics Of Samplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several advantages have been observed for the QT graft, including reduced incidence of anterior knee pain and decreased risk of patellar fracture relative to those of BPTB. A disadvantage in using the QT graft is the difficulty to harvest it because of the dense cortical bone, curved patellar surface, and close adherence to the suprapatellar pouch 23 . Anterior knee pain and weakness of the thigh were not directly evaluated in our study, only two patients complained of this possible complication (anterior knee pain) in the QT group; however, both patients had favorable outcomes at the end of follow-up.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%