2006
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-006-0221-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contemporary issues in the diagnosis of prostate cancer for the radiologist

Abstract: Prostate cancer diagnostic techniques have improved considerably in recent years, but they must yet be optimised to ensure cancer detection at a potentially curable stage. Arrangements for prostate biopsy vary throughout Europe, and prostate biopsy may be undertaken by urologists or radiologists. This review discusses current issues relevant for radiologists involved in the detection of early prostate cancer. Prostate biopsy should be based on a systematic approach involving 8-12 cores obtained with peri-prost… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 80 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A hypoechoic lesion detected in a patient with normal outcome of DRE is cancer in only 7e8% of cases, whereas random bilateral biopsies are more likely to detect cancer than directed biopsies of suspicious hypoechoic lesions [12,13]. To improve detection of prostate cancer and limit the number of biopsy cores, use of US contrast agents has been advocated by several authors [7,8,14]. Pelzer et al have demonstrated that contrastenhanced color Doppler sonography is able to detect lesions that cannot be detected using gray scale US or systematic biopsy [6].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A hypoechoic lesion detected in a patient with normal outcome of DRE is cancer in only 7e8% of cases, whereas random bilateral biopsies are more likely to detect cancer than directed biopsies of suspicious hypoechoic lesions [12,13]. To improve detection of prostate cancer and limit the number of biopsy cores, use of US contrast agents has been advocated by several authors [7,8,14]. Pelzer et al have demonstrated that contrastenhanced color Doppler sonography is able to detect lesions that cannot be detected using gray scale US or systematic biopsy [6].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%